-1 INT for THOR for not knowing what sarcasm and humor are.

-1000 INT for you all for careing about someone negating you an imaginary skill point.

am i the only one that has 3.0 GHz processor here?

too bad its wasted on 1GB RAM....

I can easily sasy i have the most pathetic computer here. are parts of your TEN YEARS OLD and from a manufacturer THAT WENT BROKE?

+2 INT for DJFrank for getting the joke

lolurdumbandstillobviouslydontknowwhatsarcasmandhumorarebecausethatwasnotsarcasmorhumoritwasfailingatbeinginsulting.

Anyway. Thinking about it, someone else I knew was having problems with this game on a Core Duo. I think multi-core processors, for some unfathomable reason, have issues with this game.

That makes me lol significantly. The game is so old-school style, high-tech equipment can't run it!

Well, it only supports one core, perhaps Data will make a multithreaded version. I wonder how well a Core 2 Duo would fare.

my computer runs cortex command slower than my friends computer which makes modding difficult for me. there are absolutely no lagginess but its just slow when I go to his house after modding a gun or something I'll try to make it as realistic as possible so when I test it on my comp it seems to run nicely then I go over there and try and its like uber fast and acts weird.

Or you could also uppgrade your cooling system. That would allow you to get into the BIOS files of your computer and manually tune up your ClockFrequency (or whatever it's called in english). There were ones some guys on Dreamhack who managed to tune up their comp from 3.2 Ghz to ~8 Ghz! Wouldn't recommend you to do that at home though, since overheated computers tend to... Melt.

Aside from the obvious lack of you getting my joke, I was under the impression from other topics that CC isn't designed to make use of Dual Core processors. So therein lies a problem?

i have a Core Duo [1.66GHz] processor and 2GB of RAM and an extremely crappy integrated video card [not that it matters], and mine runs fine until my friend [chimpeee] does something mentally challenged and overly large.

I got your joke. My statement was on how retarded said joke was. I understood both of your "jokes," but since your -first- joke is null and void because I understood HIS joke. There was no misunderstanding of said "jokes" in this thread, just your really inane sense of humor.

Additionally, the game is unable to implement and unlock the complete potential of dual core processors. Meaning: you might have dual core, but CC only uses one core. Therefore, its still using one core, just like everyone else's vanilla 32-bit processors. Using a dual core should only limit the possibilities, not hamper its function. Its a software issue, simply.

Posted after 4 minutes 22 seconds:


That would be because the graphics do not challenge a video card whatsoever. Its a pixel-by-pixel scan on the screen. There's no 3D acceleration, there's no user of shaders or intricate geometries...

What really kills the program is the number of mathematical computations required to derive the "physics" in the game. Honestly, whats needed more is a PhysX card, in all humor. Something to bear a large portion of the said mathematical computations.

Intel architectures and C-based languages are not optimized for raw number-crunching (even though I'm making a blind assumption that this is programmed in a C-based language, which it may very well not be).

if it's in C, that'll make it easier to port to PSP, lol


so what your saying is 1 core [1.66GHz] is being used on my lappy [lap top] and the RAM is saving it a little

The Internet. Serious Business.

Lol my old laptop is 1.8 GHZ but System Requirements Lab says
"You Have: 1.8 GHz Performance Rated at 3.00 GHz" (it almost beats my desktops speed) (3.2GHz)
So that is probably why your computer can run it perfectly.

I am going to go test out CC on my laptop.