| Author | Message | 
        
			| Fearful_Ferret 
					Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 3:36 pm
 Posts: 676
   |   Now let's not all rush in at once...It lags! It's crazy! It's impossible to run it without a fairly decent computer! But it's oh-so-awesome!!!
 Oh, and it makes for a really freaking big screenshot.
 
 That's right, the extreme of resolution has been reached with 1600 x 1200 unless someone sets up 2 widescreens and an awesome computer and shows the whole battlefield. For the rest of us, MAKE A BACKUP of your base.rte and then copy the base.rte contained within the attachment into your cc folder, overwriting those annoying little resolution graphics and replacing them with bona-fide bigger is better technology.
 
 
 
    							Last edited by Fearful_Ferret on Tue Jan 23, 2007 2:46 am, edited 2 times in total. 
 
 | 
		
			| Tue Jan 23, 2007 2:39 am | 
					
					   | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| Kelas 
					Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:28 am
 Posts: 978
 Location: Texas
   | It runs perfectly fine for me....no lag...
 EDIT: I've done it before, so I know..
 
 
 | 
		
			| Tue Jan 23, 2007 2:40 am | 
					
					   | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| Persh 
					Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 7:42 am
 Posts: 61
 Location: Spring, Texas
   | Already done this, except 1680x1050. 
 
 | 
		
			| Tue Jan 23, 2007 2:51 am | 
					
					     | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| Fearful_Ferret 
					Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 3:36 pm
 Posts: 676
   | ok, fine, you crazy people. Guess my comp's older than I remember.
 I thought people had already done it, but I'd might as well upload it anyway.
 
 
 | 
		
			| Tue Jan 23, 2007 2:53 am | 
					
					   | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| Dobodo4 
					Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:19 am
 Posts: 6
 Location: USA
   | for me, nothing shows up...
 just black.   
 
 | 
		
			| Tue Jan 23, 2007 6:19 am | 
					
					     | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| Empyreal 
					Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 6:34 pm
 Posts: 580
   | That means that your screen does not support that resolution. So don't try it anymore.  
 
 | 
		
			| Tue Jan 23, 2007 6:20 am | 
					
					     | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| Galaxy613 
					Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 12:31 am
 Posts: 397
 Location: USA, VA
   | I can finnally run Cortex Command at my native resolution!  
 
 | 
		
			| Tue Jan 23, 2007 6:48 am | 
					
					     | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| purple 
					Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:00 am
 Posts: 343
 Location: Devil's Advocate
   | Kelas wrote: It runs perfectly fine for me....no lag...
 EDIT: I've done it before, so I know..
I wish I could quote your signature.
 
 | 
		
			| Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:31 am | 
					
					     | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| MaximDude 
					Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 3:19 pm
 Posts: 2073
   | THATS FREAKING HUGE!!!! though to e it seems completely pointless.... i play in windowed... it reduces lag 
 
 | 
		
			| Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:31 pm | 
					
					   | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| KywerB 
					Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 1:23 pm
 Posts: 6
   | MaximDude wrote: i play in windowed... it reduces lagWhen did this start becoming possible?
 I woulda bet that windowed increases lag, due to the CPU having to run the game and the desktop...
 
 | 
		
			| Tue Jan 23, 2007 8:33 pm | 
					
					     | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| Empyreal 
					Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 6:34 pm
 Posts: 580
   | Actually, it reduces it, do to the less pixels to render. And windowed is in options when you start CC. 
 
 | 
		
			| Tue Jan 23, 2007 8:44 pm | 
					
					     | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| KywerB 
					Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 1:23 pm
 Posts: 6
   | Empyreal wrote: Actually, it reduces it, do to the less pixels to render. And windowed is in options when you start CC.I woulda thought full screen just on a smaller resolution would be better, windowed mode at 800x600 is still bigger then full screen at 640x480, windowed or not has next to no revelance about rendered pixels per screen.
 I already knew about windowed mode by the way...
 
 | 
		
			| Tue Jan 23, 2007 11:49 pm | 
					
					     | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| Fearful_Ferret 
					Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 3:36 pm
 Posts: 676
   | I've found that it does reduce lag by running it at 1024 x 768 with a windowed 640 x 480 compared to fullscreen 640x 480. It certainly takes a lot longer to take a screenie. 
 
 | 
		
			| Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:04 am | 
					
					   | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| ASH33 
					Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 4:00 pm
 Posts: 137
 Location: UnitedStates    Cheez-its: 999K+
   |   Re: Now let's not all rush in at once...Sounds like a great idea!!Fearful_Ferret wrote: That's right, the extreme of resolution has been reached with 1600 x 1200 unless someone sets up 2 widescreens and an awesome computer and shows the whole battlefield.
 *sets up 3 monitors
 
 current goal: 3072 x 1024
 
 | 
		
			| Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:22 am | 
					
					   | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| The Shroud 
					Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 2:49 pm
 Posts: 8
 Location: Now why would i tell you?
   | can i get this in 1280 by 1024? 
 
 | 
		
			| Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:34 am | 
					
					   | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
	
		|  |