| Author |
Message |
|
Pyrofalkon
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 12:38 am
Posts: 18
Location: Michigan
|
 Gentlemen, This 
|
| Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:29 am |
  
|
|
|
Tomaster
DRLGrump
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:26 am
Posts: 2037
Location: Jerking off in a corner over by the OT sub-forum
|
Re: Gentlemen, Great thread. I can see you put quite a lot of thought into this.
Just kidding, I don't have a froggy ♥♥♥♥ clue what you're trying to do here.
|
| Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:32 am |
|
|
|
Pyrofalkon
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 12:38 am
Posts: 18
Location: Michigan
|
Re: Gentlemen, Whoa umad homie?
|
| Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:40 am |
|
|
|
Urch
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:15 am
Posts: 720
Location: A fucking desert.
|
Re: Gentlemen,
|
| Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:42 am |
|
|
|
TorrentHKU
Loose Canon
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 2992
Location: --------------->
|
Re: Gentlemen, This would've been confusing but at least in the right area in the Image Dump.
|
| Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:43 am |
|
|
|
Kettenkrad
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 5:51 am
Posts: 1198
Location: Sydney
|
Re: Gentlemen, Pyrofalkon wrote: Whoa umad homie? I would imagine so, though I'd say mad is an exaggeration. Frustrated at you, though, surely. There's not much else to say other than inb4lock, and preferably ban.
|
| Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:43 am |
|
|
|
Tomaster
DRLGrump
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:26 am
Posts: 2037
Location: Jerking off in a corner over by the OT sub-forum
|
Re: Gentlemen, Frothing at the mouth, actually. Generally, even an Off-Topic thread needs to have some semblance of content. Some idea that allows discussion. You've clearly missed that point.
|
| Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:46 am |
|
|
|
Miggles
Data Realms Elite
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 5:39 am
Posts: 4558
|
Re: Gentlemen, Sorry bro but using 8 year old logic after posting a bunch of random images in a pointless topic when there is a receptacle for random images here already doesn't make you a trustworthy, likable, respectable, or intelligent forum member. You don't provide anything for this forum.
Requesting lock and ban.
|
| Mon Jul 16, 2012 7:12 am |
|
|
|
Izen
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 12:56 am
Posts: 1474
Location: At the corner of unoriginality and boring
|
Re: Gentlemen, Pyrofalkon wrote: Whoa umad homie? Requesting lock and ban based solely on this.
|
| Mon Jul 16, 2012 7:33 am |
|
|
|
Fail Flail
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:40 am
Posts: 1059
Location: I chose my fate, do not pity me.
|
Re: Gentlemen, What the ♥♥♥♥ is this? Seriously, I leave you guys for like two hours and you manage to break everything. Good Job.
|
| Mon Jul 16, 2012 7:59 am |
|
|
|
Kettenkrad
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 5:51 am
Posts: 1198
Location: Sydney
|
Re: Gentlemen, Fail Flail wrote: What the ♥♥♥♥ is this? Looks like a Soviet T-54(?) with a pistol-wielding, helmet wearing crab perched on top. It might have some sort of missile launcher? And, a battering ram? I'm not too sure. EDIT: T-62? I know not.
|
| Mon Jul 16, 2012 8:22 am |
|
|
|
Harzipan
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 9:23 pm
Posts: 1416
Location: North-Ish
|
Re: Gentlemen, I think he might have been trying to make fun of some government by saying they fund ridiculous ideas like crab tanks.
|
| Mon Jul 16, 2012 9:09 am |
|
|
|
Lizardheim
DRL Developer
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 10:29 am
Posts: 4107
Location: Russia
|
Re: Gentlemen, Pyrofalkon wrote: Whoa umad homie? Go die in a ditch.
|
| Mon Jul 16, 2012 9:46 am |
|
|
|
Kettenkrad
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 5:51 am
Posts: 1198
Location: Sydney
|
Re: Gentlemen, Oh, perhaps it's; "The government funds innumerable expensive, morally questionable military experiments, whilst a single nuclear weapon can destroy them all anyway"? God knows. I'll stop trying to figure this out now.
EDIT: If it is that, it's still stupid D:<
|
| Mon Jul 16, 2012 9:52 am |
|
|
|
p3lb0x
Forum Moderator
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 3:53 pm
Posts: 1896
Location: in my little gay bunker
|
Re: Gentlemen, Thread, locked. Warnings everywhere. Most of them related to backseat moderating instead of reporting and ignoring. But, OP was warned twice. Firstly for making a pointless and contentless (Is this even a word?) thread. Secondly for trying to aggravate other users.
|
| Mon Jul 16, 2012 10:56 am |
|
|
|
