| View unanswered posts | View active topics |
It is currently Fri Dec 27, 2024 8:54 am |
|
All times are UTC [ DST ] |
|
Page 2 of 5 |
[ 74 posts ] | Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next |
| Print view | Previous topic | Next topic |
Vista vs. XP
Vista vs. XP
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 5:35 am Posts: 3778 Location: Largo, Florida 
|
  Re: Vista vs. XPcambiogris wrote: Father Venn wrote: In my opinion Linux is the failed demon baby of Windows and Mac. You should look at its history. If it's older than me then I'll have to pass, in fact, I really just like the worlds demon baby... |
| Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:07 am |
 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 6:13 am Posts: 505
|
Re: Vista vs. XP YOU ladylike! WHAT THE ♥♥♥♥ IS WRONG WITH YOU?! LINUX IS THE GOD OF ALL OS'S!
|
| Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:09 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 5:35 am Posts: 3778 Location: Largo, Florida
|
Re: Vista vs. XP Pyrorex wrote: YOU ladylike! WHAT THE **** IS WRONG WITH YOU?! LINUX IS THE GOD OF ALL OS'S! No, that's opinion, now please delete this, I said no flaming. |
| Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:11 am |
|
|
|
|
REAL AMERICAN HERO  Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 10:25 pm Posts: 5655
|
Re: Vista vs. XP Can't remove it?
Oh, yes, except for that whole reformatting thing. |
| Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:13 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 6:13 am Posts: 505
|
Re: Vista vs. XP Yeah, Venn, I kinda dislike you anyway, for having/liking vista. Vista is eeeeevil.
|
| Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:15 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 5:35 am Posts: 3778 Location: Largo, Florida
|
Re: Vista vs. XP Grif wrote: Can't remove it? Oh, yes, except for that whole reformatting thing. No, new computers even reformatting doesn't get rid of them, trust me I tried. |
| Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:16 am |
|
|
|
 Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 10:32 pm Posts: 830
|
Re: Vista vs. XP If you have CDs to reinstall from, you could try DBAN, which will completely wipe a drive at the lowest level possible. Great tool for general disk wiping or if you have... uh... "incrimating evidence" and need to get rid of it quickly.
(link) |
| Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:27 am |
|
|
|
 Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 3:22 pm Posts: 493
|
Re: Vista vs. XP Pyrorex wrote: Yeah, Venn, I kinda dislike you anyway, for having/liking vista. Vista is eeeeevil. Honestly, I haven't found many bugs in Vista. Your excuses have collapsed. :S |
| Sun Sep 23, 2007 1:44 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 10:32 pm Posts: 830
|
Re: Vista vs. XP Shade wrote: Honestly, I haven't found many bugs in Vista. Your excuses have collapsed. :S Microsoft kills puppies. |
| Sun Sep 23, 2007 1:56 am |
|
|
|
 Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 1:26 am Posts: 165
|
Re: Vista vs. XP I agree with Canabis. Microsoft is very much evil ...
... but that doesn't dimish the fact that they're incredibly sucessful. Yeah, Linux is awesome (Mac OS and its related commercials are another matter), but it hasn't enjoyed nearly the same level of popularity. Why is this ? I haven't a clue. But whatever it is, it's the same thing that's keeping Vista from having a good name (and fueling all 'dis hatn'). IMHO, it's called people are resistant to change. Almost always  . |
| Sun Sep 23, 2007 1:59 am |
|
|
|
 Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 4:55 pm Posts: 1178 Location: America!
|
Re: Vista vs. XP I use Vista and love it. I have XP on a partition, but haven't actually used it since I've got Vista. At least for my computer, it's a hell of a lot faster. I mean, it hurts to use XP when I use other people's computers. Plus it looks nice.
|
| Sun Sep 23, 2007 2:32 am |
|
|
|
 Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 2:31 am Posts: 2982 Location: Texas
|
Re: Vista vs. XP Vista = XP on steroids.
But since it is on steroids, it has a few downsides. like having to ask for permission 3 times to do anything in the [c] drive. But since its on steroids, its WAY faster and more efficiant than XP. |
| Sun Sep 23, 2007 3:07 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 4:01 am Posts: 641 Location: um.......yeah..
|
Re: Vista vs. XP you can make it so it doesn't have to ask for permission you know
|
| Sun Sep 23, 2007 3:36 am |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 5:35 am Posts: 3778 Location: Largo, Florida
|
Re: Vista vs. XP whitty wrote: Vista = XP on steroids. But since it is on steroids, it has a few downsides. like having to ask for permission 3 times to do anything in the [c] drive. But since its on steroids, its WAY faster and more efficiant than XP. Yeah, as Striker said, just screw with the permissions and such, I already did that, I couldn't stand it asking me 300 times if I wanted to drag a file from a .rar into the desktop. |
| Sun Sep 23, 2007 3:43 am |
|
|
|
 Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 9:07 pm Posts: 36 Location: Toronto
|
Re: Vista vs. XP Vista basic has less features than XP. And Vista spies on you. But Vista Premium is still = to XP.
|
| Sun Sep 23, 2007 3:44 am |
|
|
|
|
|
Page 2 of 5 |
[ 74 posts ] | Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next |
|
All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users |
| You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum |