it's like being told fifty shades of gray displays good bsdm, but it's ♥♥♥♥ terrible at it

Currently paying for 80/4.

http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/3190746763

I am ok with this.

Uh, you sure you in Kansas?
Also, if you want to have an opinion on a person's writing, you need to come to terms with the writing.

Fifty Shades of Gray doesn't display good BDSM. It has it as a theme. It's a steaming load that started out as a Twilight fanfiction submitted to the fan website, but was deemed too bad for Stephenie ♥♥♥♥ Meyer. I've read excerpts from it, and it isn't by any means "good" BDSM. You'll find better BDSM in the Bible Black visual novel, which also has pictures, pagan tropes, and a good script.

Don't mean to be "that guy", but really 50 Shades is overrated horse ♥♥♥♥. The worst part is that people are calling it the first book to ever do this sort of thing.

I thought 50 shades was universally panned as being bad on all objective fronts except sales?
Literally the only good part about it is it shows that even if you can't write worth a damn, if you scratch some itch of the population's in the right way you can make a lot of money.

Are you telling me I have to like something before I can say it's ♥♥♥♥?

Honestly, I don't know about the writing that Grey put out, some facts are in order there; 50 Shade of Grey, however, the facts have been pretty much disseminated.

And Sothe, I guess no one reads trashy pulps anymore, and people forgot about Twilight. Or, at the very least, the ones that do remember, are the ones that liked it, and then went on to herald 50 Shades of Grey like hse and horsecock.

I'm still reading through Jane Eyre. It's incredibly thick for a romance novel. Romantic era romance. Byronic love interest and all.

I stopped reading LoTR The Fellowship because, dayum, that book is too damn big and usually there isnt anything interesting to read anyway

I'm midway through Pride and Prejudice, it's pretty funny.

i liked the hobbit, but i just could not read the lotr
its so ♥♥♥♥ boring

You're trying to tell people that this book could be good, even though you haven't read it, and are also saying it's bad?

I'm saying it's a book, and you may enjoy it as much as you may not enjoy it.
The book would be more interesting if some analysis was down on it.

So, liking it ironically? No. I'm trying to tell you this book sucks. There is no good to it.

So who wants to give me all of their winter sale snowglobes on steam so I can craft the badge more