That's because you are an alright guy, and no one messes with the professional alright guys, you are too alright.

You talk low about people who assert arguments too, as do most people. It's habitual, and not a fully conscious process for most people, but (look look I'm being contradictory) you're too much of a philistine to understand the complexity of human nature. See I'm doing this without being aggressive though. There's this thing called cucumber cool, and it's how I usually am. Besides, who are you to say I'm being aggressive from behind the computer. I'm not going around saying you or HKU are blowing steam every time I say something *mean ]:( *. My "case" is also subjective, and as you can see, people interpret my "case" differently. Rag thinks I'm blunt and tries to ignore what I say, you think I'm an aggressive jerk, Myka thinks I'm a pessimist.


I like everyone here, what do I win?

you win 1(one) free handshake, valid at any participating handshake emporium.

not responsible for death, loss of limbs, property, soul, pets, erectile dysfunction, gigantism, dwarfism, gigandwarfism, etceteraism, etc all lawsuits void, soul void, offer void in nebraska, valid until april 25 2013.

thanks

Haven't really been paying attention to this, but my name got dragged into it for some reason.

You can call it "cool as a cucumber" but you can't really say "you're too much of a philistine to understand the complexity of human nature" without looking like a big doucher.

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ isn't associated with aggression, just smugness. If smugly insulting people is a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ move then we're all douchebags.
The lack of tonality in text is there for a reason. It indicates that the writer in real life is expressing emotions that people on the other side don't see.
Sure you could assume, but yeah. It's all in the tone, which doesn't exist in message boards.

Going to bed
See you next Tuesday

Myka is right in saying that, as I see Mackerel agrees with the assertion, and you love to use really descriptive, and negative words when talking about someone else, negatively.
I am saying, that since you are arguing for yourself, without even explicitly giving personal reason-- let alone giving reference to agreeing parties-- I find that you are asserting a statement [the same statement, though factually true] over and over, but you seldom pose reason, or evidence that this statement has in relation to you.

So in essence you are yelling at other people with flagrant disregard.


You win nothing because there is much reason for Ragdoll wanting to ignore you, and you more or less drag him into the fray when he clearly doesn't want to be. This is what we call being aggressive or confrontational; whether or not you are pessimistic doesn't stop this from being an observable characteristic.

Also, a battle over semantics over insults is a fruitless endeavor, as far as HKU is concerned, ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ means jerk, and now you called everyone both.

You are being incredibly defensive, so I can't say you are being 'cool' either.

pretty much all insults are associated with aggression Sothe, you don't get to decide that
"lack of tonality on the internet is intentional" is also a p. hilarious claim to make

I found the first sentence of foa's post pretty funny but I don't know why, something about all the formal language I guess

I repeated the statement over and over to counter your circular logic. Since we've gone in full circle, I'll just continue the cycle and say that I don't think I'm being confrontational. Rag got into the discussion and I simply replied back. I referenced HKU and he simply replied back. There is an ignore feature on the site where you could block posts from people who bother you. If it was that big of an issue, they would use that feature. Though most people prefer dealing with their problems head on, which is why not a lot of people use it.

Incredibly defensive is an overstatement. I discuss issues all the time. What's on my plate right now is how people perceive me, and making a case for myself is a fundamental part of making my point. When people exchange conflicting opinions concerning my behavior, it's a completely rational action to exchange back. Quantity of defenses and intensity of defenses are different. So am I being incredibly defensive, or are you just tired of our back-and-forth?

I have to go to bed for serious now
whoa i just noticed all the improper formatting holy ♥♥♥♥ sorry if you saw my post unedited

@Metal Chao way to misquote me (or misinterpret what I meant, w/e)

you're pretty good at sleep typing

The seven hells did I just miss in a single night?

I usually stay out of this mess, but calling Anon good, is kinda disturbing in a way.

It like saying Hitler was good because he found out loads of medical advancement and technological advancement then totally ignore all the bad things he'd cause, and because Godwin law i brought Hitler/Nazism into this, so we can all get over the subject and talk about something new instead of carry on bitching and such.

so I've finally got around to playing The Ship last night, Highly entertaining two and a half hours of causally getting my face blown off by a blunderbuss.

The subject then, was Sothe being baseless, and insulting.

I ate all the shepard's pie, and I am content, a bit salty though.

Sothe reminds me a lot of Miles the rat.

He does, now that I think of it. Sothe's way better at arguing, though. And Miles was an utter ♥♥♥hole.

don't worry soaf i still respect your person

Also i went to the dentist today. Everything went better than expected, no holes and my only slight cockup is that i haven't been flossing my teeth enough. The dentist gave me some SUPER HIGH-TECH FLOSS (i think) to do it with, though, so now i can floss my teeth with TECHNOLOGY.