Found a site that spits out random images for you to sketch from reference. Did an hour of 10 minute sketches from the naked women section of the site. Because the other categories didn't really appeal to me. Faces are complete derp, should probably have left them out, but eh.

Being drunk, tired and inspired (hurh hurh tits) allows you to do amazing* things.

NSFW:


* not actually amazing, but still pretty lulzy

I was bored, so I made my D&D character.

Adriaan, the lower part of his face seems a bit blurry.

It ain't bad overall, then I look at the faces and I just lose it.
But yes, you must continue drunk-drawing, it clearly makes good things.

oh lawd, is dat sum KOBOLD? Quite nice, actually. Would look right at home in a Homestuck-ish comic. c:

also MAXWELL BOWLER MANFACE



or just MAX MANFACE among friends

his manliness is so great that reality has to hide it with silly clothing articles

not necessarily related to madmax but if you want to draw that parallel then sure

LARGEHAM WIDENECK MCSTONECHIN looks like he's missing his powered armour and his alien adversaries

What makes you think he needs powered armour?

Well, maybe not powered armour, but atleast armour with life support systems so that he can survive in vacuum while he's punching the aliens

Funk Souldiers, a story of two bad motherfunkers, Harriot, a fast paced, no-jive fool with an affinity for short range small arms, and Roy, taxi driver by day, demolitions expert by night (and holidays) and their struggle against the Disco Mafia.

Also a landscape

And thus an awesome half-serious half-comedy movie plot was born.

Yep, buddy cop movie of the decade material (-year seemed to less a title and -century too much; for all we know there could be a sequel)! Fantastic drawings

Lol, thanks fellas. I think it'd be better as a game, a fast paced shooter involving music, endless waves of thugs, and plenty of one-liners.

BTW, that hunter/trapper is pretty sweet Adriaan, the lighting is quite impressive, I like how things lower down are not as strongly lit. The shadows aren't very well defined or sharp however, which makes me think it's foggy out or there's an overcast sky (which kinda contradicts the strong lighting). Face isn't bad but the shadows need to be more defined, light that hits above and to the side is known as Rembrandt lighting and always results in a specific pattern of shadows.
http://www.thephotographypodcast.com/wp ... ghting.jpg

As for the pose, the arms are awkwardly posed, they should be more foreshortened, the upper arm should retreat back and the forearm should approach the viewer with the elbow staying pretty close to him. Here's a sloppy draw-over to clarify (or maybe confuse).
http://i.cubeupload.com/wXk8ir.png

Rembrandt lighting? I didn't know that was a term, yet i use that kind of lighting almost all the time. That's actually really useful advice, even if it wasn't for me. :U
Regardless, those drawings of yours are kickawesome, and i don't use that adjective often. And there's a BADASS FRO, i mean holy ♥♥♥♥ man are you trying to make me explode from the awesome?


SPACE IS NOT A VACUUM IF IT IS FULL OF PUNCH

hardihar

Thanks madmax, that actually helps a lot! Think I need to consider the pose more in three dimensions rather than a flat image, which I reckon frontal poses might too easily be reduced to, leading to weird anatomy and incongruent shading. Although all in all it comes down to a lack of experience with doing figures and efficient shading. Gotta practice..!

That said, here's a practice apple (ref)



That was fun to do, think I might do some more

Jesus christ, I saw that apple and swore it was a photo till I saw the leaf :O