View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu Dec 26, 2024 9:05 pm



Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
 Tested out B27... my thoughts 
Author Message

Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2011 3:33 am
Posts: 276
Reply with quote
Post Tested out B27... my thoughts
Just downloaded / installed B27 and took a look. Haven't had time to mod it up much. Here are some first impressions. This got kind of long, so for TL:DNR folks, basically I'm saying that it's better but it still doesn't feel like 1.0.

For the TL:DNR version:


Tue Jun 12, 2012 1:48 am
Profile

Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2011 3:33 am
Posts: 276
Reply with quote
Post Re: Tested out B27... my thoughts
OK, just got done blowing away the B27 Campaign. Took bout 1.5 hours.

Lessons learned:

1. Build a preset with three riflemen in a dropship. Summon dropship. Take control and air-drop riflemen on newly-spawned AI Brain. Defense over.

2. AI bases can be a bear if they have money and you don't, but not vice versa. Static defenses < infinite Rambos.

3. Getting rid of FF and FF gibs due to movement made the game 100% more playable; props for listening to players on this.

4. The AI buys from the Presets, but apparently won't buy the custom ones a player writes.

5. The Browncoats remain OP for cost, due to powerful jump packs and strength vs. Coalition Light / Heavies. Coalition Heavies continue to be neither fish nor fowl, as they aren't significantly more durable than Lights and don't seem to have many other advantages. I'd really like to see them be a lot harder to kill, even if that means they need costs to go up significantly. Haven't played enough with their weapons yet to judge costs, but initial impression is that they're a bit pricey for what you get. If / When techs limit your choices, that may make more sense.

6. If I wasn't being pretty deliberate about just min-maxing my way to victory in a quick test run, I'd want a tank-like thing... a lot. Going to mod up some tanks for the AI to summon so that they might have a chance if I give them a lot more money.

7. The disparity of offense vs. defense described above proved totally solid. The need to bring down a lot of stuff in one buy call is a big deal.

8. Mining's pointless. Do no. 1 the first time you get raided, you have lots of gold. Take weak bases, suddenly you're well over the tipping-point.

9. Speaking of tipping-points, it's way, way, way too early. I never felt like I actually had to try very hard after the first offensive battle. The bases take some pounding but it's just time, not difficult. The AI needs to not run out of stuff so quickly.

10. Nice to see the Uber-Cannon finally lives up to its name; it's the first time I've played a build and haven't had the urge to mod it immediately.

11. There still isn't a real flamethrower that really does solve tunnel branch defenses nicely. The Browncoat version doesn't cut it, needs to bounce more and have longer effective range.

12. The Remote GL is almost ridiculously OP for taking out enemies sitting around a base.

13. Still too many redundant guns and things that aren't worth buying. Sure, the Shotgun's only 30 Gold, but it's not worth buying at all. It really should be a death-machine within its range band to make up for all of its other problems, otherwise there are so many other choices that make sense.

14. The man-portable Gatling is still pretty darn useless. I'd really rather have a realistic LMG that doesn't have such a lengthy spin-up and doesn't weigh a million pounds; nerf it by making the reload time pretty awful.

15. I want to see HMGs and cannons with long AI detect ranges and reasonable firing arcs in surface bunker installations. Make players have to scout out a good route or dig mines to get past surface defenses sometimes or buy a tank. Right now, it's basically as easy as killing their spawns as they slowly come in, then whittling away; it never feels like I'm dealing with an actual bunker.

16. Really would like to see the factory / auto-spawn devices, especially for the AI's sake. It's just not working for them to have to deliver their troops via dropship when they're having to play with really strict resource limits.

17. Autosave has used a huge amount of HD space saving terrain files for terrains that probably should get reset anyhow.


Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:44 am
Profile

Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:48 am
Posts: 666
Location: Halifax, Canada
Reply with quote
Post Re: Tested out B27... my thoughts
I've got to agree with most everything you said but I want to add or suggest a few things. These don't match up to your numbers (as I'm sure anyone can see by reading them).
1. Easiest way to win defense is to spread spawn markers evenly all over the map, 5 or so of them and you won't need a bunker at all.

2. If you want a bit more difficulty try playing as non-browncoats vs. 3 browncoats on the same team. Since they all get income from each territory they'll never run out of money and if you let them land for an attack they can actually make it through a decent sized bunker because browncoat heavies are really op. On the note of that, when it takes 3 shots from a revolver cannon or half a clip of a minigun or autoshotgun or just about any other weapon coalition has to offer to kill one browncoat heavy, it's a sign that they need a nerf.

3. A factory item isn't really needed (though I guess it'd make it easier to pick a ground based spawn point), the metafight mission is all a 800 line activity. Outside of the brain checking and picking it's not very filled out or complex so it wouldn't exactly be difficult for someone with the slightest bit of lua know how (and you seem to have a good deal of it) to add land based spawns somewhere. That said, a way easier way to give a bit of challenge on defense missions is set it so every few seconds i of the enemy troops dropped down have a low chance to go into brainhunt mode, meaning you'd actually have to try to keep your brain safe.

That said, a factory would be a really cool idea, especially if there was special bunker infrastructure for it (i.e. a factory that actually looks like one). It'd probably require a good deal of rebalancing though and the maps would have to be bigger (they could probably do with that now anyway, a full prebuilt base that takes up the whole map is kind of ridiculously unfair to attackers).

4. You touched on this in your first post about how crabs are useless. I think a lot of the maps (any of the ones with mountains) were poorly thought out for CC. Since crabs can't jump and even this better actor mobility isn't perfect, it limits your options greatly. And on the note of mobility, why are the jetpacks so wonkily balanced. Some actors have ridiculously long lasting jetpacks that may or may not do very little for lifting. If the aim is to have jetpacks used as a way of getting over obstacles, not as a primary method of movement then the ideal would be high lift low fuel jetpacks that can lift an incredibly overweight actor a good way then have to recharge for a fairly long while. See jumpacks in Dawn of war and most other strategy games.

5. As mentioned at the beginning, I've got to agree with most all of what you said, real tanks and real turrets would be a very welcome addition to the game.


Tue Jun 12, 2012 5:14 am
Profile
DRL Developer
DRL Developer
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 5:27 am
Posts: 3138
Location: A little south and a lot west of Moscow
Reply with quote
Post Re: Tested out B27... my thoughts
There's some really well-thought-out comments in here. Thanks for the feedback. I can't guarantee we'll get all of this into 1.0, but I'll try to keep some of it in mind.
For the record: you can buy other factions' stuff, but their prices are quadrupled (or maybe more? Not sure. It's a large multiplier, anyway). So, for anything beyond basic pistols and stuff, it can get very expensive. The idea is that you're buying it through a black market, so it's still available, but only if you really desperately need it.


Tue Jun 12, 2012 6:19 am
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 1:13 am
Posts: 1183
Location: eating sock's face like a cupcake
Reply with quote
Post Re: Tested out B27... my thoughts
i think this sums up nicely what's on everyone's mind.


quite possibly a proverbial elephant in the room. certain things are simply broken or don't work like they should.


i do know the coalition might be getting that EOD unit that's in lizzard's avatar. it's a god damn beast and bullet sponge. but i still agree, there isn't much of a point to using coalition heavies.



also i must say the browncoat's weapon selection kinda sucks, you guys probably know that but i just wanted to say. also some offsets like the support offset for the assault rifle sucks.

the assault rifle needs something else like an underslung grenade launcher or shotgun/slug gun




one more thing. i think that you devs def need to at least look into weapon attachments, alt fires and stuff like that. it could really help out balance.




\/this will probably never happen in CC but i heard there's a CC2 planned\/
a faction based around a single actor, a pistol sized weapon template and rifle sized weapon template. the faction could be completely based around modularity. instead of carrying around a bunch of different guns they are pre-equiped with the pistol and rifle template and instead of buying guns they buy kits or mods for their guns (basically you can turn the template guns into anything available to you through mod kits, assault rifle, grenade launcher, shotgun, etc.). also you pick and choose what kind of armor and jetpack they have


Tue Jun 12, 2012 6:42 am
Profile

Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2011 3:33 am
Posts: 276
Reply with quote
Post Re: Tested out B27... my thoughts
First, just wanted to say that none of the above's meant to be dogging B27. The game's clearly going in the right direction and feels a lot better; this is pretty much what I expected with B26 and I think it's going to get where it needs to.

Played a bit with three Browncoat AIs. Browncoats Heavies aren't dying when they lose their heads atm and they're all really, really tough.

Thematically, they'd be great, except that they're OP for costs, if we're just talking bodies.

They not only have great armor, they also get great jump packs and high strength. They could remain just like they are, but they should cost twice to three times what they do.

That said, I still beat the tar out of the AI, no problems. Can't win this game because there's some sort of test map that's causing issues; I guess I need to clean out my CC install folder.

On defense, I just took light losses during the early phases.

On offense, I just sought out the Brain with air-dropped guys with assault rifles or dug them out of bunkers.

Part of the problem is the absurd vulnerability of the Brains. Yes, I know, it's the Future and cloned Brains are flying through space to be the generals of our armies... so why is he the most vulnerable troop in the game, instead of a bit more challenging?

That said, I know that nobody wants them to be Rambos on a regular basis, so one thought I had was that maybe Brains need to be dropped in a box with a turret, well-armored, that auto-digs themselves quickly into softer ground (something like the Drone attack) so that the AI is instantly defended by dirt and can shoot anybody who drops down the hole.

To release them into the classic weak Brain, use a Lua pie control. Make the digging radius big enough to get out and not get hung up on the now-defunct turret.

Thematically it'd fit, and it would give the AI a lot more staying power; no more drop-my-brain-and-ram-him-with-dropship, hehe.

One of the big factors in terms of balance is that the AI's just not evaluating over full weapon ranges and doesn't use probing fire when it hears / sees shots. So I can just whittle it from range.

The fact that I can see the AI's position via holding down Q or E any time it's not in FOW contributes heavily to this.

I honestly think that the FOW concept needs to work differently, with AI troops hidden from player view unless they have an Actor within, say, 1200 pixels. Better yet, how's about an adjustable variable that auto-adjusts according to screen resolutions so that players with all sorts of rigs can play and have a similar experience.

IDK whether Lua's allowed to get resolution, but if yes, it can be prototyped in the current aHuman code easily enough.

Up close, the AI's pretty inhuman in CQB, really, with auto-aim that's focusing on players too quickly to do anything but trade fire. There's no point in dropping down a tunnel shaft that's guarded unless you're willing to trade guys. This is actually an improvement over B26 in that regard, but it feels wonky.

I honestly think the guns need an AI parameter loosening the engagement times and accuracy a bit, kind of like spinup times, so that the AI Lua-side code can be perfectly accurate and deadly but the AI won't just behave like a perfect turret up close. If it's adjustable per weapon as a parameter, the AI can have a pretty long engagement speed and very high accuracy with, say, sniper rifles, but a short wait but lousy accuracy with SMGs. Then the AI would feel a lot more human.

But get the AI foxed by terrain or at a distance and it's toast right now; I've lost count of how many times I've seen AI troops buried in terrain and easy meat. I just fire speculatively all the time.

Also, while I'm muttering about gameplay and such; what's the future of modding looking like for this engine? There are a lot of mods, and I think that as people test it out, mods are going to generally aim towards being more balanced for the Campaign, which I think is great.

That said, the chokepoint on creating new content is a big deal; I've modded a lot of engines and this is one of the least user-friendly in terms of making new characters, simply because editing is so time-consuming.

Any possibility of a way to build new Actors with an in-game offset / walkpath editor where we can grab / rotate a part of the model, define the points that detect collisions with the ground, test stiffness and strength and where we can set up each frame of animation and do some tests of speeds vs. animations, instead of being limited to aCrab / aHuman hard-coded stuff and laborious text-editing?

Most of that's just showing things that are already there and allowing read-write instead of just read; rotations are just reversing the math for the bones and giving us a widget that will allow us to define it numerically or use the mouse to do it visually and then write it back to the RTE when we're happy with it. Just need to draw the skeleton positions and allow for new bones to be built and defined instead of limiting it to aHuman / aCrab; instead of limiting the bones, I'd suggest just declaring that all Actors have a common set of animations, i.e., walk, jump, crouch, aim one / two handed, carry shields, etc. and custom ones that don't have things defined won't be able to do said action.

That would be cool; don't define a Crouch animation and the Actor cannot crouch, for characters where it's not appropriate.

But please let modders define how many legs / wheels / whatever and ground-collision points so that things like vehicles get a lot less buggy feeling, kind of like that demo of the new engine you folks were working on with true 3D collisions.

I don't actually think it needs to be that perfect, but it'd be nice to be able to define, say, 8 ground-collision points for a long skinny thing like a tank that would keep it from eating terrain.


Tue Jun 12, 2012 5:37 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 12:05 pm
Posts: 53
Location: Anacortes, WA
Reply with quote
Post Re: Tested out B27... my thoughts
I agree heavily with everything you've said, both in the original posts and this last one, and I wanted to specifically address this:

xenoargh wrote:
The fact that I can see the AI's position via holding down Q or E any time it's not in FOW contributes heavily to this.

I honestly think that the FOW concept needs to work differently, with AI troops hidden from player view unless they have an Actor within, say, 1200 pixels. Better yet, how's about an adjustable variable that auto-adjusts according to screen resolutions so that players with all sorts of rigs can play and have a similar experience.


I totally agree that the FOW concept needs to be reworked in a major way. There have been numerous occasions where I could see vaguely where the enemy brain was based on the "Destroy!" marker and just fire blindly into the blackness, resulting in a "WIN!" and having never seen the enemy brain.

I don't have a big problem with scanning, or not being able to see where exactly gold is in the ground (both of which make sense to have an obscured view) but I agree that the LOS concept is fairly broken, and the fact that AI completely ignores it just makes it more or less an annoying cheat for them.

Additionally broken about the LOS concept is that you can magically "see further" simply by dragging the mouse to "aim". For sniper weapons this can looks really silly when you can "see" through a long, narrow section due to the extreme zoom. Then you can just swing the mouse around in a circle to clear out a bunch of area. Seems odd TBH.


Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:00 pm
Profile

Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:48 am
Posts: 666
Location: Halifax, Canada
Reply with quote
Post Re: Tested out B27... my thoughts
Well that makes sense really, if you have a sniper and you scope in you'll be able to see farther in a limited area. Fog of war represents how far an actor is able to see. Thus how it works makes perfect sense for a sniper. For other guns without scopes it doesn't make sense but that's not a major problem really.

But yeah, recovering fog of war would be a good thing. In fact I don't understand why data didn't just choose to follow the rts formula of black fog and grey fog where black fog stays gone and grey fog comes back and obscures actors (or better yet shows them foggily at their last seen position) but not terrain or scene objects.


Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:16 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 10:32 pm
Posts: 1609
Location: UK
Reply with quote
Post Re: Tested out B27... my thoughts
xenoargh wrote:
Played a bit with three Browncoat AIs. Browncoats Heavies aren't dying when they lose their heads atm and they're all really, really tough.


Glad to know this isn't just happening to me. Kinda freaky taking a Heavy's head off with a bolter or sniper shot and seeing him just standing there with ~30 health left, firing back like nothing happened.

Might be a MOID limit thing, but I haven't tested it much myself.


Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:19 pm
Profile YIM
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 12:40 am
Posts: 327
Location: US of A
Reply with quote
Post Re: Tested out B27... my thoughts
I think it should be kept, adds to the vision of toughness the browncoats have. Unstoppable warriors that even a headshot won't stop...


Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:47 pm
Profile
DRL Developer
DRL Developer
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 5:27 am
Posts: 3138
Location: A little south and a lot west of Moscow
Reply with quote
Post Re: Tested out B27... my thoughts
Browncoats will definitely be nerfed. We've already fixed the head bug.


Tue Jun 12, 2012 10:09 pm
Profile WWW

Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:48 am
Posts: 666
Location: Halifax, Canada
Reply with quote
Post Re: Tested out B27... my thoughts
Yeah, I found it weird that they didn't need heads but it's also pretty cool and I wouldn't really mind it staying as long as they end up properly balanced otherwise (price or other toughness). And I'm pretty sure it wasn't an MOID thing, it was just how the actor was coded.


Tue Jun 12, 2012 10:23 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 12:05 pm
Posts: 53
Location: Anacortes, WA
Reply with quote
Post Re: Tested out B27... my thoughts
Bad Boy wrote:
Well that makes sense really, if you have a sniper and you scope in you'll be able to see farther in a limited area. Fog of war represents how far an actor is able to see. Thus how it works makes perfect sense for a sniper. For other guns without scopes it doesn't make sense but that's not a major problem really.

But yeah, recovering fog of war would be a good thing. In fact I don't understand why data didn't just choose to follow the rts formula of black fog and grey fog where black fog stays gone and grey fog comes back and obscures actors (or better yet shows them foggily at their last seen position) but not terrain or scene objects.


True, but then like I said you can just spin the mouse around and see in a huge radius. I guess that's "realistic" as well, but I think one issue is that if you don't have a scoped weapon your view distance seems incredibly limited compared to what would be "realistic".

I'm not entirely sure how to solve it but the way it is currently is somewhat off-putting.


Tue Jun 12, 2012 10:38 pm
Profile

Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:48 am
Posts: 666
Location: Halifax, Canada
Reply with quote
Post Re: Tested out B27... my thoughts
Oh yeah, realism doesn't necessarily make for good gameplay, especially not in something like CC. Gameplay-wise it's kind of irritating and silly to see. It also makes scanners have a very limited usefulness (i.e. see through walls) because it's more useful to buy a sniper and use that for large open distances.
That said, I'm not sure how to really fix this since all of the solutions I can think of seem worse than what we have now. I can say however that actors' view distances should be greater and have a wider arc, it's really irritating at times when you don't see something 30 degrees above you while you're looking straight.


Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:35 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 12:05 pm
Posts: 53
Location: Anacortes, WA
Reply with quote
Post Re: Tested out B27... my thoughts
Yeah, I was thinking maybe it would make sense to just reveal all terrain/objects within a radius of the player, except where view would be obstructed. That might be better gameplay-wise.


Wed Jun 13, 2012 6:17 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.
[ Time : 0.303s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]