View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu Dec 26, 2024 5:45 am



Reply to topic  [ 75 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 WBC v Anonymous | Part 2 
Author Message
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4074
Location: That quaint little British colony down south
Reply with quote
Post Re: WBC v Anonymous | Part 2
Her smile will forever haunt my nightmares. Her words will annoy me for a few minutes.
I again can't take this church seriously when all of their arguments are just ridiculously childish. I've seen more mature arguments from eight year olds.


Fri Feb 25, 2011 6:36 am
Profile WWW
Data Realms Elite
Data Realms Elite
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:05 am
Posts: 3878
Reply with quote
Post Re: WBC v Anonymous | Part 2
I don't know what to think. That little church of theirs is just so ridiculous with all the stupid statements.
And the hacking of the website.
Anon wins.
Also, I got all the other references Ben posted but I missed the 'row row fight the power' -one.


Sat Feb 26, 2011 2:35 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4074
Location: That quaint little British colony down south
Reply with quote
Post Re: WBC v Anonymous | Part 2
One of Gurren Lagann's opening songs was something with a line 'Raw! Raw! Fight the power!'. It was incredibly cheesy and sounded like 'Row! Row! Fight tha powar!', so it became a meme.


Sat Feb 26, 2011 2:41 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 3:57 pm
Posts: 1020
Reply with quote
Post Re: WBC v Anonymous | Part 2
411570N3 wrote:
One of Gurren Lagann's opening songs was something with a line 'Raw! Raw! Fight the power!'. It was incredibly cheesy and sounded like 'Row! Row! Fight tha powar!', so it became a meme.

Later, moot made /b/ have the background music that line.
And all text in posts was replaced by "Row! Row! Fight tha powar!"


Sat Feb 26, 2011 9:43 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 9:29 pm
Posts: 73
Reply with quote
Post Re: WBC v Anonymous | Part 2
I don't know what it is about it, but that shit-licking smile just pisses me off.


Tue Mar 01, 2011 10:22 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 1930
Reply with quote
Post Re: WBC v Anonymous | Part 2
Damn Anon is now ♥♥♥♥ with Playstation Network because HEAVEN FORBID Sony doesn't want people pirating their software! Honestly, I'm getting sick of them just going around saying "free flow of information hurr durr" and then acting like they have the moral high ground. BLURGLEBURGLE I just wanted to play Castle Crashers with my friend.


Wed Apr 06, 2011 3:32 am
Profile
happy carebear mom
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 7096
Location: b8bbd5
Reply with quote
Post Re: WBC v Anonymous | Part 2
If you're talking about the row with Geohot, I would invite you to consider what he did versus what they did.

He found a way to run whatever software he liked on his piece of hardware (which he bought), and told other people how to do the same.
They sued him for everything he owns, then got a judge to grant them access to most everything relating to his life (paypal account, twitter account, website logs, youtube logs on his videos, I believe more as well).

As far as anonymous is concerned, they are staging a protest in whatever fashion they can. If you disagree with them that's fine but don't dismiss it as a bunch of pirates wanting to pirate games.


Wed Apr 06, 2011 3:46 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 1930
Reply with quote
Post Re: WBC v Anonymous | Part 2
Alright, I can see where they're coming from. Can't they think of a better way of protest, though, than interfering with the millions of people who use the service (PSN) frequently?


Wed Apr 06, 2011 4:08 am
Profile
happy carebear mom
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 7096
Location: b8bbd5
Reply with quote
Post Re: WBC v Anonymous | Part 2
You hit companies where it hurts, in the service that makes them money.


Wed Apr 06, 2011 4:14 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 2:31 am
Posts: 2982
Location: Texas
Reply with quote
Post Re: WBC v Anonymous | Part 2
...Except the PSN is free.


I think Anon is doing a wonderful thing here.
And I'm not even a Playstation fan.


Wed Apr 06, 2011 4:21 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 1930
Reply with quote
Post Re: WBC v Anonymous | Part 2
...Except that sporadically taking down the Playstation Network (and their efforts in general) will probably have very little effect on their cash flow. I'm guessing they MIGHT just see Sony easing up on George just for the purpose of saving face. If even that.

And sorry, I just hate Anonymous in general - I'm really pretty biased. Like back with the whole 'attack PayPal because they choose not to forward donations' bit, which just seemed dreadfully hypocritical.

Whitty, not being a Playstation fan just means you'd be LESS likely to not like it. If you don't use the service (which I do, quite a lot), then why should you give a rat's ass if someone's ♥♥♥♥ with it?

Seriously though, this isn't gonna change anything by May it'll be forgotten, but for now, it's pretty annoying.


Wed Apr 06, 2011 4:23 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 10:50 pm
Posts: 2175
Location: Neverwhere
Reply with quote
Post Re: WBC v Anonymous | Part 2
wait whats happening with PSN. I haven't noticed anything


Wed Apr 06, 2011 6:17 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4074
Location: That quaint little British colony down south
Reply with quote
Post Re: WBC v Anonymous | Part 2
Ociamarru wrote:
'attack PayPal because they choose not to forward donations' bit, which just seemed dreadfully hypocritical.
They picked on the things about paypal still forwarding donations for things like the KKK and double standards more than their actual nonsupport.


Wed Apr 06, 2011 6:22 am
Profile WWW
happy carebear mom
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 7096
Location: b8bbd5
Reply with quote
Post Re: WBC v Anonymous | Part 2
whitty wrote:
...Except the PSN is free.

PSN is free, yes, but interrupting a service that gamers expect causes them to get angry (like Ocia here), and angry customers are usually not repeat customers.
Plus it's a hell of a way to get publicity. I wouldn't have known Anon was doing this if Ocia hadn't said something.


Wed Apr 06, 2011 12:13 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 1930
Reply with quote
Post Re: WBC v Anonymous | Part 2
I don't really see how that's gonna negatively impact SONY, just Anonymous. They stopped targeting Playstation Network, though, which is nice. Now I can play Fat Princess with my friend.


Last edited by Ociamarru on Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:29 am, edited 1 time in total.



Thu Apr 07, 2011 12:48 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 75 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.
[ Time : 0.133s | 14 Queries | GZIP : Off ]