Author |
Message |
Duh102
happy carebear mom
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 1:40 am Posts: 7096 Location: b8bbd5
|
WBC v Anonymous | Part 2
Looks like they're back at it again. Anonymous' statementWBC's responseI'm on the side of Anon this time. I'd really like for the driving members of WBC to be shot in the kneecaps, and I don't say that lightly. What about you guys?
|
Sun Feb 20, 2011 11:26 pm |
|
|
FoiL
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2007 4:02 pm Posts: 1434
|
Re: WBC v Anonymous | Part 2
I absolutely loved their "Come at me bro". Looks like WBC is in knee deep ♥♥♥♥.
|
Sun Feb 20, 2011 11:32 pm |
|
|
Foa
Data Realms Elite
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:14 am Posts: 3966 Location: Canadida
|
Re: WBC v Anonymous | Part 2
Wow, the reply to anonymous looks more like a hissy fit than anything.
|
Sun Feb 20, 2011 11:37 pm |
|
|
Tomaster
DRLGrump
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:26 am Posts: 2037 Location: Jerking off in a corner over by the OT sub-forum
|
Re: WBC v Anonymous | Part 2
I want WBC to be completely obliterated in the anger that is Anonymous.
|
Sun Feb 20, 2011 11:41 pm |
|
|
Foa
Data Realms Elite
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:14 am Posts: 3966 Location: Canadida
|
Re: WBC v Anonymous | Part 2
Tomaster wrote: I want WBC to be completely obliterated in the anger that is Anonymous. I wouldn't blame them. [.-. . -- .. -.. ... / -- . / --- ..-. / - .... .- - / .- -. --. .-. -.-- / -.-. .- - .... --- .-.. .. -.-. / .. / -- ..-. ..-. . -. -.. . -.. / - --- / - .... . -- / -.. . -. -.-- .. -. --. / -- -.-- / . -..- .. ... - . -. -.-. . ; - .-. ..- - .... / -... . / - --- .-.. -.. , ... .... . / .. ... / .- / -... .. - -.-. .... / - --- / -.-. --- .-. .]
|
Sun Feb 20, 2011 11:46 pm |
|
|
Petethegoat
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 4:02 pm Posts: 905
|
Re: WBC v Anonymous | Part 2
Duh102 wrote: 'I'd really like for the driving members of WBC to be shot in the kneecaps sterilized via bullets, and I don't say that lightly. Fix'd. There's a great documentary by Louis Theroux; The Most Hated Family in America. Hilarious stuff.
|
Sun Feb 20, 2011 11:56 pm |
|
|
TorrentHKU
Loose Canon
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:07 pm Posts: 2992 Location: --------------->
|
Re: WBC v Anonymous | Part 2
Ragdollmaster wrote: I'm going to laugh in two days when I turn on the news and Phelps' [leader of WBC] house is burning to the ground, surrounded by a ring of Anonymous wearing Guy Fawkes masks singing Kumbaya. And the police will do absolutely nothing. This.
|
Sun Feb 20, 2011 11:59 pm |
|
|
Duh102
happy carebear mom
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 1:40 am Posts: 7096 Location: b8bbd5
|
Re: WBC v Anonymous | Part 2
Even more drama. The anonymous letter was forged by WBC.
|
Mon Feb 21, 2011 1:23 am |
|
|
TorrentHKU
Loose Canon
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:07 pm Posts: 2992 Location: --------------->
|
Re: WBC v Anonymous | Part 2
What. The plot thickens...
|
Mon Feb 21, 2011 2:11 am |
|
|
Tomaster
DRLGrump
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:26 am Posts: 2037 Location: Jerking off in a corner over by the OT sub-forum
|
Re: WBC v Anonymous | Part 2
Apparently people just aren't interested in people marching on veteran's funerals anymore.
|
Mon Feb 21, 2011 2:13 am |
|
|
Foa
Data Realms Elite
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:14 am Posts: 3966 Location: Canadida
|
Re: WBC v Anonymous | Part 2
|
Mon Feb 21, 2011 2:16 am |
|
|
Duh102
happy carebear mom
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 1:40 am Posts: 7096 Location: b8bbd5
|
Re: WBC v Anonymous | Part 2
Both of these letters were written by WBC. The link I just posted is the true Anonymous response.
|
Mon Feb 21, 2011 2:31 am |
|
|
maart3n
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 8:04 pm Posts: 1545
|
Re: WBC v Anonymous | Part 2
To be honest, and I must say the I advocate freedom of speech above nearly anything else, the WBC is just taking it too far. They are not only trying to hurt as many people as they can in "the time before the apocalypse" they are also, as anonymous says, in it for the money. I mean look at the documentary and tell me that these people are using all their resources for their goals. I am still wondering why wikileaks does get sued, but these people aren't. How is wikileaks an act of terrorism and this not treason? Nor can I see how these people claim to be the bride of christ, how stupid and foolish do you think you are? Using bible quotes to justify their actions, just like terrorists use the koran to justify theirs. Defying all logic with the following quotes: Quote: THOU SHALT NOT KILL! Quote: This baby died for the sins of West Virginia – you all raised this mother to be a proud ladylike and pursue her lusts. You should have told her the truth! Now the baby is dead and the mother faces 15 years in prison. Their blood is on your hands! I'm sorry, but at least the terrorists know what they are thinking. Now don't get me wrong here, I support neither, I am commenting on the horribly media like ways the WBC use to convince people, to shock and awe. Now if you are so sure of your righteousness and of how your god protects you, could you all please do [url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NeUPCPRgVHU"]this[/url]. Because, if your preaching is correct, you should survive this without any injuries. And while we are at it, can you please let your god smite me with lightning, tomorrow would do.
|
Mon Feb 21, 2011 3:48 am |
|
|
Tomaster
DRLGrump
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:26 am Posts: 2037 Location: Jerking off in a corner over by the OT sub-forum
|
Re: WBC v Anonymous | Part 2
maart3n wrote: I am still wondering why wikileaks does get sued, but these people aren't. How is wikileaks an act of terrorism and this not treason? I didn't fully understand the rest of your post, but I had to point this out. Wikileaks was revealing secret documents that weren't meant to be displayed to the public. WBC is a bunch of religious zealots and fanatics using the 1st amendment to its fullest. I'm not saying I support what they're doing, but they do have the right to do it, no matter how despicable it is.
|
Mon Feb 21, 2011 3:53 am |
|
|
Azukki
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 9:44 pm Posts: 1916 Location: Flint Hills
|
Re: WBC v Anonymous | Part 2
If wbc anonymously sent the letter to themselves, it's technically not forgery.
But I'm guessing it was 'them', but then they claimed forgery for lulz. Of course 'they' are an unorganized organization with no clear identity anyway, so each action and reference to them would only include a certain portion of their whole.
By the way, before anyone says wbc should be nuked, etc, keep in mind that most of Topeka, including the surrounding area, is ashamed of them and hates them no less than you. It's vaguely like wanting a plane to crash into John's office, because John's a douche who everyone hates, when John works in the middle of the world trade center.
|
Mon Feb 21, 2011 4:50 am |
|
|
|