That's completely irrelevant. It's like, lets see which is better at playing dvds, this $20 dvd player, or this dual core $10,00 computer.

when the correct answer is that both are equally good?

Actually no, Grif has a pretty good point there. It's not as if the Wii is hundreds of times worse than the Move just because the Move is more accurate. There's a difference, yes, but it's pretty minute. The one thing I think we can expect from Move is better games than the ones made for the Wii, but even that is a pretty disputable fact since (AFAIK) no launch titles have been announced yet.

No I am saying that the comp has a lot of capacity to do stuff the dvd player can't, so you can't just say "HERP! THIS ONE IS WAAAY CHEAPER THEREFORE BETTER".

While roast veg did make a pretty retarded point, I fail to see how bringing up a multi-function device is an adequate point of comparison

if you're only comparing whether X and Y can both do Z, it doesn't matter that X can also do A-D; they're not the point

I know it does, otherwise it would only function as a pointer and wouldn't be able to be used as it is in most games.

I'd like to ask anybody who read my post earlier in the thread to go and read the IGN reviews on the Move games, if only so I can point at any previous disbelievers and say "HAW HAW I WAS RIGHT".
Actually, I was wrong on one thing: Kung-Fu Rider really sucked.