View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu Jan 16, 2025 9:18 am



Reply to topic  [ 96 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
 Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS 
Author Message
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2007 4:02 pm
Posts: 1434
Reply with quote
Post Re: Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS
You wrote Mhz instead of Ghz.


Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:18 am
Profile
DRL Developer
DRL Developer
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 5:27 am
Posts: 3138
Location: A little south and a lot west of Moscow
Reply with quote
Post Re: Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS
Yeah, I told you I underclocked it. It's just going really, REALLY slow.
Seriously though, I originally had it written in MHz and ended up converting them to GHz, but apparently I forgot to change it. Thanks for the catch.
Also, just for the record, that was on a fresh install of CC with very little running on the background.


Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:59 am
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2007 4:02 pm
Posts: 1434
Reply with quote
Post Re: Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS
That actually gave me an idea. Anyone with a P2 or a P133 laying around whiling to waste half an hour?


Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:08 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 5:52 am
Posts: 229
Reply with quote
Post Re: Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS
http://pastebin.com/yv2t90RE

I do have some mods in but they're just lua scenes run from the campaign, so I don't think there's much extra stuff in the buy menu. I'll do a clean install later.


Wed Apr 28, 2010 2:34 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2007 4:02 pm
Posts: 1434
Reply with quote
Post Re: Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS
Just out of curiosity, what type of socket is your processor?


Wed Apr 28, 2010 2:58 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 2:04 am
Posts: 1559
Reply with quote
Post Re: Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS
That AMD Sempron just seems so off on the chart for Test 3.


Wed Apr 28, 2010 3:04 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 9:57 am
Posts: 4886
Location: some compy
Reply with quote
Post Re: Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS
Image
Ramps, for those interested.
Looks pretty certain that core clock plays the largest role in this, but newer processors also seem to have a significant lead (compare the xeon with the P4, for instance)


Wed Apr 28, 2010 4:53 am
Profile WWW
DRL Developer
DRL Developer
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 5:27 am
Posts: 3138
Location: A little south and a lot west of Moscow
Reply with quote
Post Re: Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS
What I find interesting is that FPS3 is the only one that seems to have any noticeable discrepancy between the results (in my case, in the very least). At lower levels of strain, it's more than likely dependent more on RAM than anything.


Wed Apr 28, 2010 5:25 am
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 9:57 am
Posts: 4886
Location: some compy
Reply with quote
Post Re: Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS
Yeah, I suppose the problem is that in normal situations the strain is comparable to the heaviest test.


Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:45 am
Profile WWW
REAL AMERICAN HERO
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 10:25 pm
Posts: 5655
Reply with quote
Post Re: Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS
TheLastBanana wrote:
What I find interesting is that FPS3 is the only one that seems to have any noticeable discrepancy between the results (in my case, in the very least). At lower levels of strain, it's more than likely dependent more on RAM than anything.


Well, the difference between 10 and 100 particles is an awful lot less than 1000 and 10000.

The whole testing protocol should be redone around more "realistic" scenarios, but, uh, frankly, I don't have the time or effort to do so.


Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:04 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2007 4:02 pm
Posts: 1434
Reply with quote
Post Re: Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS
I just noticed that keptin's 1.something P3 is on par with my 3.2 celeron, I suspect it's due to the celeron's low amount of cache.


Wed Apr 28, 2010 9:56 am
Profile
Data Realms Elite
Data Realms Elite
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:05 am
Posts: 3878
Reply with quote
Post Re: Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS
Code:
CC PERFORMANCE TESTER V0.2
COPYRIGHT 2010 GRIFFITH INDUSTRIES
OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ultimate
PROCESSOR: AMD Phenom II x2 550 Processor 2 CPUs 3.1 gHz
RAM: 4096MB DDR3
RESX: 640
RESY: 480
PPM: 20
POSTPROCESSING: true
MOD COUNT: 11
TIMESCALE: 1
DELTATIME: 0.016666699200869
TEST RESULT 1 : 17.37
TEST RESULT 2 : 35.1
TEST RESULT 3 : 62


I thought my comp could do better. I am disappoint. :-(


Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:30 pm
Profile
REAL AMERICAN HERO
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 10:25 pm
Posts: 5655
Reply with quote
Post Re: Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS
Code:
CC PERFORMANCE TESTER V0.2
COPYRIGHT 2010 GRIFFITH INDUSTRIES
OS: W7 Ultimate 64-bit
PROCESSOR: Core 2 Duo E7400 @ 2.27 ghz
RAM: 4 GB
RESX: 640
RESY: 480
PPM: 20
POSTPROCESSING: true
MOD COUNT: 11
TIMESCALE: 1
DELTATIME: 0.016666699200869
TEST RESULT 1 : 17.74
TEST RESULT 2 : 35.16
TEST RESULT 3 : 73.26


Mon May 03, 2010 3:18 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 2:31 am
Posts: 2982
Location: Texas
Reply with quote
Post Re: Performance Survey
At 3.00Ghz:
Code:
CC PERFORMANCE TESTER V0.2
COPYRIGHT 2010 GRIFFITH INDUSTRIES
OS: Windows 7 64-bit
PROCESSOR: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 2.66Ghz (OC@3.00Ghz), *4
RAM: 6 GB
RESX: 640
RESY: 480
PPM: 20
POSTPROCESSING: true
MOD COUNT: 54
TIMESCALE: 1
DELTATIME: 0.016666699200869
TEST RESULT 1 : 17.58
TEST RESULT 2 : 35.92
TEST RESULT 3 : 63.08


At 3.2Ghz:
Code:
CC PERFORMANCE TESTER V0.2
COPYRIGHT 2010 GRIFFITH INDUSTRIES
OS: Win7 Ultimate x64
PROCESSOR: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 2.66Ghz (OC@3.20Ghz), *4
RAM: 6 GB DDR2
RESX: 800
RESY: 600
PPM: 20
POSTPROCESSING: true
MOD COUNT: 61
TIMESCALE: 1
DELTATIME: 0.016666699200869
TEST RESULT 1 : 18.85
TEST RESULT 2 : 36.37
TEST RESULT 3 : 62.45

It is actually slower at the higher clock for the first two tests, and faster only on the last. Weird.


Mon May 03, 2010 9:32 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 9:57 am
Posts: 4886
Location: some compy
Reply with quote
Post Re: Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS
The lower ones seem somewhat based on chance. Look at TLB's ramp, it's all over the place at the lower values. Regardless, 0.2GHz isn't going to make that much of a difference.
Also natti, what the hell? Those are good results.
I should make a "demo" prom grounds testing scene, with scripted entity movement and 'splosions and the like, but I'm kind of too busy at the moment <_< Still, cheers for all the data guys.


Thu May 06, 2010 3:18 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 96 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.
[ Time : 0.128s | 15 Queries | GZIP : Off ]