FAQ • Search • Login
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Tue Nov 04, 2025 11:38 am

Board index » Cortex Command » Game Discussion

All times are UTC [ DST ]



Reply to topic  Page 4 of 7
  [ 96 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
 Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS 
Author Message
Duh102
happy carebear mom
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 7096
Location: b8bbd5
Reply with quote
Post Re: Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS
Hyperkultra wrote:
Lower ... better?

Seeing as they are measures of FPS, no, not really.
Mon Apr 26, 2010 6:04 pm
Profile
TorrentHKU
Loose Canon
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 2992
Location: --------------->
Reply with quote
Post Re: Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS
I find it hard to believe that some of those are measures of FPS. I mean, a 2 Ghz AMD Sempron getting over 400 FPS?
Mon Apr 26, 2010 6:22 pm
Profile WWW
Duh102
happy carebear mom
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 7096
Location: b8bbd5
Reply with quote
Post Re: Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS
Well game simulation is not affected by render fps, like I tend to get 200 fps with nothing going on.
Mon Apr 26, 2010 6:26 pm
Profile
FoiL
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2007 4:02 pm
Posts: 1434
Reply with quote
Post Re: Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS
The P8xxx seem to be winning, which I find kind off odd, due to the low clock.
Mon Apr 26, 2010 6:29 pm
Profile
TorrentHKU
Loose Canon
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 2992
Location: --------------->
Reply with quote
Post Re: Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS
FoiL wrote:
The P8xxx seem to be winning, which I find kind off odd, due to the low clock.

My point exactly. Is the rating more like milliseconds taken to complete, or something? Maybe?
Yeah, after looking at it further, it makes more sense if the number is actually time taken to complete instead of FPS.
Mon Apr 26, 2010 6:34 pm
Profile WWW
FoiL
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2007 4:02 pm
Posts: 1434
Reply with quote
Post Re: Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS
Still doubt that too. If that were the case the P8600 would be somewhat faster than my P8400.
Mon Apr 26, 2010 6:36 pm
Profile
TorrentHKU
Loose Canon
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 2992
Location: --------------->
Reply with quote
Post Re: Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS
I would say that it's small enough of a difference to be negligable. People have different programs running in the background, and different hardware too.
Mon Apr 26, 2010 6:42 pm
Profile WWW
FoiL
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2007 4:02 pm
Posts: 1434
Reply with quote
Post Re: Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS
Yeah, the test results are very awkward. This pc barely runs the tester with nothing going on at 30FPS with a 0.60 timescale.

Code:
CC PERFORMANCE TESTER V0.2
COPYRIGHT 2010 GRIFFITH INDUSTRIES
OS: Windows XP SP3
PROCESSOR: Celeron (R) 2.93 @3.23Ghz
RAM: 512Mb
RESX: 640
RESY: 480
PPM: 20
POSTPROCESSING: true
MOD COUNT: 11
TIMESCALE: 1
DELTATIME: 0.016666699200869
TEST RESULT 1 : 28.89
TEST RESULT 2 : 64.38
TEST RESULT 3 : 224.21
Mon Apr 26, 2010 6:45 pm
Profile
Dragon239

Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:23 am
Posts: 63
Location: Michigan, USA
Reply with quote
Post Re: Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS
Told us not to post results directly to thread, so results are here:
http://pastebin.com/wUSYNQVE
Apologies, not vista/an older CPU, but I figured I might as well test.
Are those results good or bad? The FPS was 1000 firs the first 2 tests, and for the the third it would flicker to 500, then 333, then back to 1000 when everything was clear.
Mon Apr 26, 2010 8:48 pm
Profile WWW
TorrentHKU
Loose Canon
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 2992
Location: --------------->
Reply with quote
Post Re: Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS
Those are very very good results.
And they prove my theory about low numbers being better.
Mon Apr 26, 2010 8:53 pm
Profile WWW
Duh102
happy carebear mom
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 7096
Location: b8bbd5
Reply with quote
Post Re: Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS
Oh, my bad. I was reading off the graph and you were reading the results themselves.
Mon Apr 26, 2010 9:30 pm
Profile
Geti
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 9:57 am
Posts: 4886
Location: some compy
Reply with quote
Post Re: Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS
Yeah, lower results are better (Except for RAM), as they're deviations from "normal" FPS, not the actual FPS readings. Larger numbers mean larger impact of particle stress. I'll put the new results up once i've got them into the xls, I'm at school at the moment.
Mon Apr 26, 2010 9:43 pm
Profile WWW
whitty
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 2:31 am
Posts: 2982
Location: Texas
Reply with quote
Post Re: Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS
I'll boot from Vista in a few and edit in the results.

*EDIT*
Vista broke.


Last edited by whitty on Mon Apr 26, 2010 10:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Mon Apr 26, 2010 10:03 pm
Profile
unwoundpath
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 7:19 am
Posts: 1279
Location: Places. And things.
Reply with quote
Post Re: Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS
VISTA!!!!

(that mod count is embarresing :oops: )


CC PERFORMANCE TESTER V0.2
COPYRIGHT 2010 GRIFFITH INDUSTRIES
OS:
PROCESSOR:
RAM:
RESX: 800
RESY: 600
PPM: 20
POSTPROCESSING: true
MOD COUNT: 102
TIMESCALE: 1
DELTATIME: 0.016666699200869
TEST RESULT 1 : 52.53
TEST RESULT 2 : 73.67
TEST RESULT 3 : 359.77


i turn'd my volume up in the last test on accident.
Mon Apr 26, 2010 10:13 pm
Profile
FoiL
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2007 4:02 pm
Posts: 1434
Reply with quote
Post Re: Performance Survey - WE NEED VISTA AND OLDER CPU RESULTS
Code:
CC PERFORMANCE TESTER V0.2
COPYRIGHT 2010 GRIFFITH INDUSTRIES
OS: Windows XP SP3
PROCESSOR: Pentium 4 2.66@3.04Ghz
RAM: 1Gb
RESX: 640
RESY: 480
PPM: 20
POSTPROCESSING: true
MOD COUNT: 11
TIMESCALE: 1
DELTATIME: 0.016666699200869
TEST RESULT 1 : 39.4
TEST RESULT 2 : 57.85
TEST RESULT 3 : 164.07


Here's another one.
Mon Apr 26, 2010 10:13 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   Page 4 of 7
  [ 96 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

Board index » Cortex Command » Game Discussion

All times are UTC [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.
[ Time : 0.264s | 14 Queries | GZIP : Off ]