View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Mon Oct 07, 2024 10:55 pm



Reply to topic  [ 72 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 MODDING FEATURE SUGGESTION THREAD 
Author Message
happy carebear mom
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 1:40 am
Posts: 7096
Location: b8bbd5
Reply with quote
Post Re: MODDING FEATURE SUGGESTION THREAD
Geti wrote:
Lizard wrote:
A CanLand = true/false function on dropships
i think that exists.

Unused, pretty sure.


Sun Oct 04, 2009 7:21 pm
Profile
DRL Developer
DRL Developer

Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 5:09 am
Posts: 395
Reply with quote
Post Re: MODDING FEATURE SUGGESTION THREAD
How about implementing the "ToMagazine" function so we don't have to do "ToMagazine = ToMOSRotating" in order to run scripts on ejected magazines?


Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:17 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 9:41 am
Posts: 712
Location: New York
Reply with quote
Post Re: MODDING FEATURE SUGGESTION THREAD
A line in inis which allows for sprites to be flipped if they are going to be Ping Pong animated.


Tue Oct 06, 2009 4:49 am
Profile YIM
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 4:20 am
Posts: 4772
Location: Good news everyone!
Reply with quote
Post Re: MODDING FEATURE SUGGESTION THREAD
That would just be another SpriteAnim.


Tue Oct 06, 2009 4:53 am
Profile WWW
REAL AMERICAN HERO
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 10:25 pm
Posts: 5655
Reply with quote
Post Re: MODDING FEATURE SUGGESTION THREAD
How about we generalize: more control over sprite animation modes, perhaps custom defined? eg specify a frame order and a loop setting if no preexisting mode works well

Also, MOSParticles animating properly on a setting other than lifetime. Framerate doesn't do jack ♥♥♥♥, and it's impossible to set frames through lua (they're constantly reset back to whatever their lifetime setting is telling them to be animated to)

Mostly unrelated to that, proper glows on higher level MOSprites, eg MOSRs, actors, AEmitters, without having to resort to flashes or glowing mopixels.

An absolute, in .ini setting, to completely disable movableman settling. As a general application to all mosprite classes, including devices.

An absolute Scuttles boolean on all craft, with no AI overrides.


Tue Oct 06, 2009 5:12 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 9:57 am
Posts: 4886
Location: some compy
Reply with quote
Post Re: MODDING FEATURE SUGGESTION THREAD
assuming implementation of MOSRotating glows, multiple glow effects under the class of screeneffect, a bool on weather the glow oscillates between the start and stopeffectstrength or whatever theyre called, a vector offset for the glow, and a setting of weather the glow rotates with the MOSR or not (if not, the glow would "pivot" on its vector offset.
marvelous.
Grif wrote:
An absolute Scuttles boolean on all craft, with no AI overrides.
i'd prefer 3 options, no scuttle, player can scuttle, and whatever we want to call the current behavior, besides shitty. if no scuttle is set, the option vanishes from the pie menu.


Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:56 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 9:41 am
Posts: 712
Location: New York
Reply with quote
Post Re: MODDING FEATURE SUGGESTION THREAD
The ability to zoom in within the actor editor, as one can in the gib editor. This, along with a basic grid in the background would make fiinding offsets much easier, without the need to make a whole new editor as others have suggested - just using preexisting features.


Mon Oct 12, 2009 7:16 pm
Profile YIM
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 9:57 am
Posts: 4886
Location: some compy
Reply with quote
Post Re: MODDING FEATURE SUGGESTION THREAD
Ability to control the volume of a sound in .ini, as well as in Lua, preferably with a max and min range.
Fix gib editor to not save with a huge output if the gibs have gibs or emissions (or maybe it's just gibs)
Add reload x.rte option to editors menu. seriously, if that had been a feature before i had bought CC, it would have sped up the process.


Thu Oct 15, 2009 7:26 am
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 4:19 am
Posts: 1119
Reply with quote
Post Re: MODDING FEATURE SUGGESTION THREAD
-BUMP-

The variable for all actors:
Disposable
If that variable is set to 1, the actor's death won't count towards the kill count. Great for drop crates, drop pods, teleports, "transforming" actors and what not.


Tue Oct 20, 2009 8:49 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 4:20 am
Posts: 4772
Location: Good news everyone!
Reply with quote
Post Re: MODDING FEATURE SUGGESTION THREAD
That's a pretty good idea, DSMK.


Tue Oct 20, 2009 8:52 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 9:44 pm
Posts: 1916
Location: Flint Hills
Reply with quote
Post Re: MODDING FEATURE SUGGESTION THREAD
If I remember correctly, a simple script can do that, but making it ini moddable would be handy.


There should be an SpriteAnimMode for attachables that sets them to the same frame as what they're attached to.
This would make breakable limb armor possible, and could be used in some other situations.


I would love to see a better damage system.
MOPixels and MOSParticles [particles capable of causing wounds] should have variables that can modify properties of the wounds they inflict, both entry and exit. [perhaps multipliers for the wounds' defined variables].
Properties I have in mind are BurstDamage, BurstSize, BurstScale, EmissionDamage, ParticlesPerMinute, and ParticalCountLimit.

Damage and other wound properties should also be affected by the depth of penetration. There's a huge difference between two inches and eight inches of penetration. Obviously, ballistic penetration is a big damage factor on initial damage [BurstDamage], initial blood lost [BurstSize and BurstCount], bleeding damage [EmissionDamage], total blood loss [ParticleCountLimit], and rate of blood loss [ParticlesPerMinute].

Wound sprites could also have multiple frames that represent the magnitude of the wound. The visible entry wound inflicted from a BB and a .50BMG should look very different.
Old wounds could slowly animate backwards, disappearing and no longer contributing to GibWoundCount when they're done. That would make healing, and related gameplay mechanics, more feasible.

Damage from impacts could use some reworking too. I hate how impulse damage is in 10 damage intervals. There should be a minimum impulse at which you start to take damage, and a maximum impulse at which instant death occurs [100 health loss]. Between those, damage should be gradual. GibImpulseLimit is fine as is, being separate from damage.

The factor at which something takes damage should also be .ini definable. Right now, on AHumans, Heads take 5x damage, the torso/arms/legs take 1x damage, and other attachables take no damage. Instead of these hardcoded settings, there should be a DamageFactor variable that is a multiplier for wound damage inflicted on that object. So I could set the headshot damage to 6x, and arms and legs to 0.8x, without making multiple similar wounds for the objects.


Last edited by Azukki on Mon Jan 04, 2010 7:58 am, edited 4 times in total.



Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:38 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 9:57 am
Posts: 4886
Location: some compy
Reply with quote
Post Re: MODDING FEATURE SUGGESTION THREAD
Azukki wrote:
If I remember correctly, a simple script can do that,
Truth. I think it's kinda useless to add that to .ini modding but i suppose it could be pretty quickly implemented.


Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:44 am
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4074
Location: That quaint little British colony down south
Reply with quote
Post Re: MODDING FEATURE SUGGESTION THREAD
Azukki wrote:
MOPixels and MOSParticles [particles capable of causing wounds] should have variables that can modify properties of the wounds they inflict, both entry and exit. [perhaps multipliers for the wounds' defined variables].
Properties I have in mind are BurstDamage, BurstSize, BurstScale, EmissionDamage, ParticlesPerMinute, and ParticalCountLimit.
So custom wounds? Wouldn't it be better to just define the new wound? That way there wouldn't be anything you can do with normal wounds that you couldn't do with these wounds.


Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:30 am
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 4:20 am
Posts: 4772
Location: Good news everyone!
Reply with quote
Post Re: MODDING FEATURE SUGGESTION THREAD
Then Browncoats would get hurt as much as puny little crabs.


Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:42 am
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4074
Location: That quaint little British colony down south
Reply with quote
Post Re: MODDING FEATURE SUGGESTION THREAD
Not quite: they'd lose health at the same rate.
Though I personally was thinking specifically about Lua'd wounds, once we get both custom wounds and Lua'd attachables; easy enough to scale damage to unit mass in addition to lots of other nice fun things you can do with Lua.


Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:07 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 72 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.
[ Time : 0.037s | 15 Queries | GZIP : Off ]