| Author | Message | 
        
			| ProjektTHOR Banned 
					Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 4:05 pm
 Posts: 2527
   |   Rule proposalPunish people who post before searching.  A large part of our thread volume consists of people answering threads asking frequent queries and people posting relevant threads. I advocate that punishment for posters that are called out on not searching before posting. A good example of an OP that should be warned is this: viewtopic.php?f=75&t=16634
 
 | 
		
			| Wed Sep 23, 2009 8:11 pm | 
					
					     | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| Duh102 happy carebear mom 
					Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 1:40 am
 Posts: 7096
 Location: b8bbd5
   |   Re: Rule proposalI think warns are a bit too harsh. Perhaps an extension of the post approval thing that newbs have to go through. Ask a stupid question, suffer under post approval before you can post on your own again. Then again, that might be too much work for the mods. 
 
 | 
		
			| Wed Sep 23, 2009 8:15 pm | 
					
					   | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| Metal Meltdown Banned 
					Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 9:22 pm
 Posts: 826
 Location: Lookin' forward to mocking people on Jan 1st 2013.
   |   Re: Rule proposalActually, I agree with THOR. But that should apply to everyone, not only newbs. A warn should also be sent to the person who releases sub-par mods which lack even one redeeming quality, even though we haven't had a lot of those lately. 
 
 | 
		
			| Wed Sep 23, 2009 8:28 pm | 
					
					     | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| ProjektTHOR Banned 
					Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 4:05 pm
 Posts: 2527
   |   Re: Rule proposalUh, warning for perceived "bad mods" is arbitarary, whereas what I am advocating is based on a discrete rule violation: Clearly not searching adequately before posting a question.
 And noobs already go through post approval, why would you want to add more burden to the staff members by forcing them to moderate every single thread that goes into that subforum?
 
 
 | 
		
			| Wed Sep 23, 2009 8:32 pm | 
					
					     | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| Metal Meltdown Banned 
					Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 9:22 pm
 Posts: 826
 Location: Lookin' forward to mocking people on Jan 1st 2013.
   |   Re: Rule proposalProjektTHOR wrote: Uh, warning for perceived "bad mods" is arbitarary.By "sub-par mods" I meant lafe-like sprites with bullet hoses, things which I think we can all agree should stay private unless they're part of a larger pack (i.e. redeeming qualities).
 
 | 
		
			| Wed Sep 23, 2009 8:36 pm | 
					
					     | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| Aspasia 
					Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 4:42 am
 Posts: 308
 Location: The Peaceful Town of Hamlet
   |   Re: Rule proposalWarns wouldn't be too harsh Duh, for they don't really do anything other than be a way for mods to formally let you know to stop flailing your ♥♥♥♥ around. Also, I agree that not searching be punishable. 
 
 | 
		
			| Wed Sep 23, 2009 11:34 pm | 
					
					   | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| Duh102 happy carebear mom 
					Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 1:40 am
 Posts: 7096
 Location: b8bbd5
   |   Re: Rule proposalAspasia wrote: they don't really do anything other than be a way for mods to formally let you know to stop flailing your walrus around.Sounds good then.
 
 | 
		
			| Thu Sep 24, 2009 12:03 am | 
					
					   | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| Mind 
					Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 10:54 pm
 Posts: 1360
 Location: USA
   |   Re: Rule proposalI honestly vote for a pm to the person asking them to use the search button rather than a warn, but I'm cool with a warn.  Wait that's the same thing.  Wow. 
 
 | 
		
			| Thu Sep 24, 2009 1:57 am | 
					
					   | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
	
		|  |