Author |
Message |
ProjektTHOR
Banned
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 4:05 pm Posts: 2527
|
Rule proposal
Punish people who post before searching. A large part of our thread volume consists of people answering threads asking frequent queries and people posting relevant threads. I advocate that punishment for posters that are called out on not searching before posting. A good example of an OP that should be warned is this: viewtopic.php?f=75&t=16634
|
Wed Sep 23, 2009 8:11 pm |
|
|
Duh102
happy carebear mom
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 1:40 am Posts: 7096 Location: b8bbd5
|
Re: Rule proposal
I think warns are a bit too harsh. Perhaps an extension of the post approval thing that newbs have to go through. Ask a stupid question, suffer under post approval before you can post on your own again. Then again, that might be too much work for the mods.
|
Wed Sep 23, 2009 8:15 pm |
|
|
Metal Meltdown
Banned
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 9:22 pm Posts: 826 Location: Lookin' forward to mocking people on Jan 1st 2013.
|
Re: Rule proposal
Actually, I agree with THOR. But that should apply to everyone, not only newbs. A warn should also be sent to the person who releases sub-par mods which lack even one redeeming quality, even though we haven't had a lot of those lately.
|
Wed Sep 23, 2009 8:28 pm |
|
|
ProjektTHOR
Banned
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 4:05 pm Posts: 2527
|
Re: Rule proposal
Uh, warning for perceived "bad mods" is arbitarary, whereas what I am advocating is based on a discrete rule violation: Clearly not searching adequately before posting a question.
And noobs already go through post approval, why would you want to add more burden to the staff members by forcing them to moderate every single thread that goes into that subforum?
|
Wed Sep 23, 2009 8:32 pm |
|
|
Metal Meltdown
Banned
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 9:22 pm Posts: 826 Location: Lookin' forward to mocking people on Jan 1st 2013.
|
Re: Rule proposal
ProjektTHOR wrote: Uh, warning for perceived "bad mods" is arbitarary. By "sub-par mods" I meant lafe-like sprites with bullet hoses, things which I think we can all agree should stay private unless they're part of a larger pack (i.e. redeeming qualities).
|
Wed Sep 23, 2009 8:36 pm |
|
|
Aspasia
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 4:42 am Posts: 308 Location: The Peaceful Town of Hamlet
|
Re: Rule proposal
Warns wouldn't be too harsh Duh, for they don't really do anything other than be a way for mods to formally let you know to stop flailing your ♥♥♥♥ around. Also, I agree that not searching be punishable.
|
Wed Sep 23, 2009 11:34 pm |
|
|
Duh102
happy carebear mom
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 1:40 am Posts: 7096 Location: b8bbd5
|
Re: Rule proposal
Aspasia wrote: they don't really do anything other than be a way for mods to formally let you know to stop flailing your walrus around. Sounds good then.
|
Thu Sep 24, 2009 12:03 am |
|
|
Mind
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 10:54 pm Posts: 1360 Location: USA
|
Re: Rule proposal
I honestly vote for a pm to the person asking them to use the search button rather than a warn, but I'm cool with a warn. Wait that's the same thing. Wow.
|
Thu Sep 24, 2009 1:57 am |
|
|
|