God, you're just making excuses now.

Realistic? Robots? Lazer guns?
A good way to explain infinite ammo is that it is "teleported down from tradestar. (only ammo can be teleported, given it's small size.)"

You may have good points though...
But is adding limited ammo really going to fix those problems?

You'll just buy a lot of ammo, or go to your magazine point and continue spamming your gatling gun.
Buying ammo will be a hassle, and it will just complicate the buy menu and the AI.

It will hurt everything, not to mention attacking.
Imagine you attacking and, oops! Out of ammo! You're dead.

Adding limited ammo might fix some problems, but it will make more arise.

What are you talking about? Both combat robots and lasers already exist in real life. It's not a matter of "does it exist?", it's a matter of "does this obey the laws of physics?"


Yes, you buy ammo. You spend all your money on spamming a gatling gun. Whoops! You have no more money because you are retarded and don't understand the S in RTS!

Whoops! You are dead because you are retarded and don't understand the S in RTS!

Teleportation does not violate any tested and proven law of physics.
I'm also pissed at Firefox not knowing what teleportation's spelling is.

You also ignored half of my post.

I'm tired of arguing over a pointless subject with a thick headed jerk, as limited ammo will never be put into cortex command.

I cut half of your post out because it was irrelevant and did not contain any points. To an outsider following the debate this is helpful.

You can throw a temper tantrum because I have a differing position if you want. I'll still be here when you've picked up your toys and are ready to tackle this issue more maturely.

This game has brains in jars, crabs that can carry grenades, spaceships, zombies, and skeletons.


I for one would absolutely hate limited ammo. I see no reason for it to be implemented besides for those among us who love absurd amounts of micromanagement (fine if you do but please don't change games to suit that style ). Guns are balanced in this game, grenades could use a recharge so that grenade launchers are not infinitely better.

I am not throwing as you call it a "temper tantrum" I am merely stating that I don't care about arguing anymore, because it wouldn't, and doesn't, matter. You aren't going to budge on your opinion, which is why I said you are thick headed, you are not listening to my side and only debating.
So why should I bother?


That's right. -_-;


I still don't get how still don't get how this strayed from having a system to un-limit grenades to a conversation about limiting ammo.

The only mention of limiting gun ammo is a negative one, and the thread was supposed to be about making grenades more useful. This has already been discussed.
This thread serves no purpose.

What is so unrealistic about brains in jars? You give a brain means to survive on its own and nothing has changed. Did you know? Science has shown that the brain treats tools as an extension of the body! Tools are nothing more than additional inputs to the brain's functions.

Without eyes we would adapt. With four eyes we would adapt. Why do you think we are able to create artificial limbs and voice synthesizers that rely on brain waves for input? Our brains are not limited to our bodies. They have simply adapted to what is available.

Do not attempt to patronize me when your own understanding of science is severely limited.

Crabs with grenades? I haven't done that in CC. But the ability should be removed. It's stupid.

Uh, spaceships? You mean the same spaceships that have existed since, uh, the 60s? Yeah, totally unrealistic.

Zombies and skeletons... zombies are completely possible, skeletons, well, that speaks for itself. Are skeletons even supposed to be a race in the final game?

Oh, and I got this gem of a PM from SABER15:



Yeah, sounds like the developers should really value your opinion.

Ugh, as I said:
Teleportation does not violate any tested and proven law of physics.

Problem of violation solved.

Then we can stop using dropships and rockets. Is it possible in accordance with the laws of physics? Yes.

Does it exist in CC's universe? Apparently not.

It is not hard to understand.


You are. The only points you have made I have either properly retorted with supporting evidence, or agreed with, because I never disagreed in the first place.

You give me a substantial argument and you may convince me otherwise. But shallow, poorly thought-out arguments full of logical fallacies will get you nowhere. Me not "budging" from my positions does not make me stubborn. It makes you a poor debater.

And you scientific knowledge is also, very, very limited.

The unrealistic part of brains in jars is the ability to function, get oxygen, and to remotely control other organisms.
This may be possible in hundreds of years, but it is very unrealistic currently.


No, voice synthesizers use electrical signal sent to the vocal cords to make voices. We are not adapting to the synthesizer, it is adapting to us.

Of course we could adapt without eyes, there is such a thing as a blind person. Put being able to control other bodies and to see through their eyes, is, technically impossible.

(Why am I still arguing? I thought I said i I was sick of arguing. I guess I'm bored...)


edit:

Obviously you did not read my post.



You're whole argument isn't a shallow, poorly thought out argument, deefiniitely.
Sorry I'm not a born debater like you, why don't you run for president.

Bunker Systems says otherwise.
There might be a problem of cost, distance, stability, ect.

Right, but this is the game with lazer beams. You're contradicting yourself again and highlighting your inability to keep a consistent argument.

Ask yourself one thing. Is CC set in the year 2009? No? Okay then.


You're right, they do exist. Which doesn't make sense at all because we're still using rockets and dropships. It doesn't many any sense to be able to teleport something small onto a moving unit while having teleportation through the emptiness of space being impossible. I can't argue that one any further because it's pseudo-science and we're making up rules for things we do not understand.

Again, with the ignoring.


High powered lazers are not possible right now, the highest powered lazer over can barely pop a kernel of popcorn.
Also note the MAY before the be possible.

Data's intentions are to follow the laws of physics. Nothing more really needs to be argued, as your lack of comprehension skills don't allow for serious debate.

p.s. the highest powered lasers available can begin nuclear fusion, split atoms, or shoot missiles out of the sky