View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Wed Jan 15, 2025 10:19 pm



Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 PhysX in CC? 
Author Message
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 5:35 am
Posts: 3778
Location: Largo, Florida
Reply with quote
Post Re: PhysX in CC?
I agree with Daman though that UT3 was terrible and had terrible physics.


Tue Sep 09, 2008 1:39 am
Profile WWW

Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 11:04 pm
Posts: 2932
Reply with quote
Post Re: PhysX in CC?
I dont see what you mean by bad physics in UT3. The ragdolls were fun, controlling vehicles was fun, the guns were fun, killing was fun and deaths were fun.

I dont really pay attention to technical stuff under the game, the main point that it has good gameplay, and imo UT3 did have a good one.

I enjoyed it totally and still am with new mods like 3rd person view and alot of other custom stuff keeps making UT3 even more fun.


Tue Sep 09, 2008 4:20 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:07 pm
Posts: 511
Location: ☼The Infinite World☼
Reply with quote
Post Re: PhysX in CC?
numgun wrote:
I dont see what you mean by bad physics in UT3. The ragdolls were fun, controlling vehicles was fun, the guns were fun, killing was fun and deaths were fun.

I dont really pay attention to technical stuff under the game, the main point that it has good gameplay, and imo UT3 did have a good one.

I enjoyed it totally and still am with new mods like 3rd person view and alot of other custom stuff keeps making UT3 even more fun.

You should try UT2004. It's basically the same thing with less computer-intensiveness (that means the graphics aren't quite as good, but still) and around 999 times the amount of custom content. I'm completely serious, too.


Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:30 am
Profile

Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:56 am
Posts: 564
Location: Behind a DarKlone, trying to pierce its fudging armor!
Reply with quote
Post Re: PhysX in CC?
And Jaybud knows game customization.

UT2004 was better in my opinion, stuff didn't feel underpowered and vehicles weren't impossible to drive. Anyways, I haven't seen many outstanding changes that would make PhysX worth being converted over. Prove me wrong I guess.


Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:44 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:22 am
Posts: 1451
Reply with quote
Post Re: PhysX in CC?
numgun wrote:
I dont see what you mean by bad physics in UT3. The ragdolls were fun, controlling vehicles was fun, the guns were fun, killing was fun and deaths were fun.

I dont really pay attention to technical stuff under the game, the main point that it has good gameplay, and imo UT3 did have a good one.

I enjoyed it totally and still am with new mods like 3rd person view and alot of other custom stuff keeps making UT3 even more fun.


04 had better physics and can run on 1ghz/256mb ram computers.

UT3 = bad.

Oh and zalo the physics in that 2d implementation look HORRIBLE. They could have just as well used any other physics engine and been just as good or better. Nothing special to PhysX there.


Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:40 pm
Profile

Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 7:11 pm
Posts: 1496
Reply with quote
Post Re: PhysX in CC?
I'm not trying to promote 2D PhysX, it's just that this entire
thread is named after a 3D engine put into a 2D game, so it
seemed like a relevant link.

You could get the same kind of performance increase
if Data just integrated his existing engine with CUDA.


Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:09 am
Profile WWW

Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 11:04 pm
Posts: 2932
Reply with quote
Post Re: PhysX in CC?
I own UT2k4 and I must say UT3 wins it by 6/0. The vehicles in UT2k4 sucked balls so I have no idea what you are talking about. Specifically the scorpion in the old one was trash, admit it, nobody liked that ribbon gun it had. Also the overall look of UT3 is amazing and much more cool than the old one and I love the new looks of the guns and the little details on how they function. And the effects... just beatiful.

Also, the vehicles feel much more powerful in the new game alot. The weapons seem a tad weaker compared to the last game, but still remain devastating and satisfying to use so I dont complain.


Fri Sep 12, 2008 12:55 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 1:13 am
Posts: 1183
Location: eating sock's face like a cupcake
Reply with quote
Post Re: PhysX in CC?
ITT

Rich ♥♥♥holes need a legitimate use for their useless physx card.


Sun Sep 21, 2008 1:54 am
Profile

Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:56 am
Posts: 564
Location: Behind a DarKlone, trying to pierce its fudging armor!
Reply with quote
Post Re: PhysX in CC?
Let the thread die. And change your avatar, it's disgusting.


Sun Sep 21, 2008 1:55 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 1:13 am
Posts: 1183
Location: eating sock's face like a cupcake
Reply with quote
Post Re: PhysX in CC?
You know you want to lick it.


Sun Sep 21, 2008 1:56 am
Profile
Banned

Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 6:09 pm
Posts: 432
Reply with quote
Post Re: PhysX in CC?
NeoSeeker wrote:
ITT

Rich ♥♥♥holes need a legitimate use for their useless physx card.
NeoSeeker is winrar.


Sun Sep 21, 2008 2:10 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:07 pm
Posts: 511
Location: ☼The Infinite World☼
Reply with quote
Post Re: PhysX in CC?
ProjektODIN wrote:
NeoSeeker wrote:
ITT

Rich ♥♥♥holes need a legitimate use for their useless physx card.
NeoSeeker is winrar.

Problem: Not physx card but Nvidia 8xxxx and up series GPU.


Tue Sep 23, 2008 1:25 am
Profile
Banned

Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 6:09 pm
Posts: 432
Reply with quote
Post Re: PhysX in CC?
jaybud4 wrote:
ProjektODIN wrote:
NeoSeeker wrote:
ITT

Rich ♥♥♥holes need a legitimate use for their useless physx card.
NeoSeeker is winrar.

Problem: Not physx card but Nvidia 8xxxx and up series GPU.

What are you talking about? The 8-series is perfectly good. I'm not sold on the 9-series yet but that's not the same as the PhysX card. All games support gpu. Not all support physx.
y


Tue Sep 23, 2008 8:16 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 5:56 am
Posts: 1191
Location: outside the shithole called the University in the Forest
Reply with quote
Post Re: PhysX in CC?
I think he meant that the driver updates allow the 8-series and up to function as PhysX cards to some extent.


Tue Sep 23, 2008 8:46 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 1:13 am
Posts: 1183
Location: eating sock's face like a cupcake
Reply with quote
Post Re: PhysX in CC?
It's still a piece of hardware most of us don't want to get to play a sidescroller.


Why invest resources in developing a seperate version that utilizes the physics processor when not that many people can take advantage of it anyways?


Fri Sep 26, 2008 12:08 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.
[ Time : 0.049s | 15 Queries | GZIP : Off ]