Author |
Message |
Vash
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 6:27 am Posts: 195 Location: America
|
 Re: Wargames discussion
I think each army should be limmited to 2 custom units.This does not include mechs.Also I suggest people make Very basic sprites for their armies to notice what is attacking where.
|
Fri Aug 10, 2007 7:59 pm |
|
 |
Prod
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 9:52 pm Posts: 688 Location: California
|
 Re: Wargames discussion
I know other tanks that can be included, along with APCs, 4x4s, 6x6s, 8x8s, and self-propelled guns. Here are two tanks that should be included:
Chinese NORINCO Type-85: 125mm gun, roof-mounted 12.7mm gun, coaxial 7.62mm
Russian T-64: 125mm gun, 12.7mm AA gun (roof), 7.62mmm coaxial gun
If you approve, I've got a book-full of stuff.
|
Fri Aug 10, 2007 7:59 pm |
|
 |
warper
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 5:53 am Posts: 80 Location: Coming to an asteroid field near you!
|
 Re: Wargames discussion
I've got to disagree with you, Vash, we should be allowed as many as we want. If your worried about stuff being overly powerful, the reason its so good is because its costs ridiculous prices. And the GMs have to approve it, so theres not likely gonna be anything over powered.
|
Fri Aug 10, 2007 8:07 pm |
|
 |
Alenth Eneil
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 3:34 am Posts: 2378
|
 Re: Wargames discussion
I smell DRA coming on, just minus the rediculous equations.
|
Fri Aug 10, 2007 8:17 pm |
|
 |
Vash
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 6:27 am Posts: 195 Location: America
|
 Re: Wargames discussion
I made a sprite of an Abrams and a"make your own army" sprite sheet that people can easilly recolor for the pieces of their army
|
Fri Aug 10, 2007 8:22 pm |
|
 |
Alenth Eneil
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 3:34 am Posts: 2378
|
 Re: Wargames discussion
I'll delete DRA and put this in it's place if you guys want...
I'm no good at planning simple games, I like complexity. I would have cities and everything.
|
Fri Aug 10, 2007 8:26 pm |
|
 |
Vash
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 6:27 am Posts: 195 Location: America
|
 Re: Wargames discussion
why delete the data realms aren just for this,ont people still play the DRA.oh never mind what do I know anyways.
|
Fri Aug 10, 2007 8:32 pm |
|
 |
Grif
REAL AMERICAN HERO
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 10:25 pm Posts: 5655
|
 Re: Wargames discussion
Hmm.
I disapprove of specific names for tanks, because it's unlikely many neighboring countries would have them.
Maybe a heavy battle tank, with roughly the abram's specs, and a light battle tank, with less armor and armament, but, easier to transport and faster.
Same thing goes for the other types of units.
|
Fri Aug 10, 2007 8:36 pm |
|
 |
3 solid
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:02 pm Posts: 1639 Location: Somewhere. Nowhere.
|
 Re: Wargames discussion
My 1337 units. Yup. I'm still using agents. 
Attachments:
Units.PNG [1.76 KiB]
Downloaded 129 times
|
Fri Aug 10, 2007 8:38 pm |
|
 |
Vash
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 6:27 am Posts: 195 Location: America
|
 Re: Wargames discussion
sounds good.But they could also look differenet and have different names and maybe slightly different weapons depending on the players preferences.They would still be classified as heavy tank or light tank but with slightly different stuff. Like my type-900 tank in the last game.it was like the Abrams except instead of machine guns and that shotgunny thing it had a small aa gun and a Banhammer launcher.(banhammer being a type of missle which was supposed to be Bang Hammer but i made a typo and was about to change it until i saw a barticular piece of Cinos's fan art which showed a robot named Thor shooting actual hammers that said Ban on them.so they ar now Ban Hammers) you can notice the extra on my type-900 tank and the slight shape difference. Attachment: Army sprites..PNG I also think each unit should have a stat sheet like this Armour=whatever it is Speed=whatever it is Attack=whatever it is price=whatever it is armour=whatever it is the values should be from 1-10 so that we can compare the results.
|
Fri Aug 10, 2007 8:52 pm |
|
 |
warper
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 5:53 am Posts: 80 Location: Coming to an asteroid field near you!
|
 Re: Wargames discussion
my stuff:
Attachments:
File comment: I think they look ok.
Units.PNG [4.97 KiB]
Downloaded 107 times
|
Fri Aug 10, 2007 9:52 pm |
|
 |
Vash
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 6:27 am Posts: 195 Location: America
|
 Re: Wargames discussion
Nicesprites warper.Now maybe some aircraft would be good.
|
Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:08 pm |
|
 |
Kirby teh Pink
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 7:30 am Posts: 335 Location: Delicious food place
|
 Re: Wargames discussion
WHAAAAAAA!!!!!
Its over!? what went wrong?? i didnt see any reason to start over! i was about to do the single most awesome thing you could ever do in an RTS!
Meh, nevermind, I'll recolour some AW sprites.
|
Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:41 pm |
|
 |
warper
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 5:53 am Posts: 80 Location: Coming to an asteroid field near you!
|
 Re: Wargames discussion
only made a fighter.
Attachments:
Units.PNG [5.71 KiB]
Downloaded 81 times
|
Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:44 pm |
|
 |
Vash
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 6:27 am Posts: 195 Location: America
|
 Re: Wargames discussion
Looking good Warper.Ill be working on more vehicles myself.
|
Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:45 pm |
|
 |
|