Data Realms Fan Forums http://45.55.195.193/ |
|
World of Warcraft: Cataclysm http://45.55.195.193/viewtopic.php?f=82&t=16326 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Author: | Mombasa [ Sun Aug 23, 2009 3:59 am ] |
Post subject: | World of Warcraft: Cataclysm |
Well, Blizzard released the trailer for the third expansion for WoW titled Cataclysm. http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/cataclysm/ Some of the announced features of the new expansion: * New class combinations * New races (Worgen (werewolves) and Goblins) Quote: Adventure as one of two new races--the cursed worgen with the Alliance or the resourceful goblins with the Horde. Quote: Earn new abilities, tap into new talents, and progress through the path system, a new way for players to improve characters Quote: Familiar zones across the original continents of Kalimdor and the Eastern Kingdoms have been altered forever and updated with new content, from the devastated Badlands to the broken Barrens, which has been sundered in two. * New Secondary profession, Archaeology Quote: Master a new secondary profession to unearth valuable artifacts and earn unique rewards. Quote: Take on PvP objectives and daily quests on Tol Barad Island, a new Wintergrasp-like zone, and wage war in all-new rated Battlegrounds. Quote: New High-Level Zones Explore newly opened parts of the world, including Uldum, Grim Batol, and the great Sunken City of Vashj'ir beneath the sea. More Raid Content than Ever Before Enjoy more high-level raid content than previous expansions, with optional more challenging versions of all encounters. Quote: Progress as a guild to earn guild levels and guild achievements. |
Author: | ProjektTHOR [ Sun Aug 23, 2009 1:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: World of Warcraft: Cataclysm |
Flying in Azeroth. Finally. Only thing I care about. |
Author: | The Fat Sand Rat [ Sun Aug 23, 2009 11:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: World of Warcraft: Cataclysm |
Now to wait like 5 years for the private servers to get this up and running. |
Author: | Duh102 [ Mon Aug 24, 2009 12:48 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: World of Warcraft: Cataclysm |
The Fat Sand Rat wrote: 5 years for the private servers If it takes 3 weeks for them to implement a patch, and patches average around 100mb, and an expansion averages 6gig, and assuming implementation time is directly proportional to filesize, then approximately 3.54 years. Yes, I just bothered to calculate that. Why am I wasting my time? |
Author: | ProjektTHOR [ Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: World of Warcraft: Cataclysm |
The Fat Sand Rat wrote: Now to wait like 5 years for the private servers to get this up and running. |
Author: | Ophanim [ Mon Aug 24, 2009 10:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: World of Warcraft: Cataclysm |
Dawg you are inviting so much bad trolling by using "normal person". |
Author: | ProjektTHOR [ Mon Aug 24, 2009 1:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: World of Warcraft: Cataclysm |
"Normal WoW player" |
Author: | The Fat Sand Rat [ Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: World of Warcraft: Cataclysm |
Why would I pay $10 a month for this? Not worth it, IMO. I'd rather buy two new games a year with the same money. |
Author: | Kallemort [ Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: World of Warcraft: Cataclysm |
GOOD JOB BLIZZARD YOU HAVE WEREWOLVES BUT YOU MAKE THEM FURRIES |
Author: | Duh102 [ Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: World of Warcraft: Cataclysm |
The Fat Sand Rat wrote: Why would I pay $15 a month for this? You forgot a five. |
Author: | Kelas [ Tue Aug 25, 2009 2:08 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: World of Warcraft: Cataclysm |
The Fat Sand Rat wrote: Why would I pay $10 a month for this? Not worth it, IMO. I'd rather buy two new games a year with the same money. Except two new games a year don't have nearly as much content or replay value. Good job being content with limited gaming. |
Author: | Ophanim [ Tue Aug 25, 2009 2:40 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: World of Warcraft: Cataclysm |
Isn't it usually the non-WoW players making shitty, close-minded, idiotic arguments, Kelas? |
Author: | The Fat Sand Rat [ Tue Aug 25, 2009 3:30 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: World of Warcraft: Cataclysm |
I think that's subjective. A year of grinding is not my idea of fun. Besides, if I bought 2 first person shooters with decent online multiplayer, that's hours of gameplay right there. |
Author: | Ophanim [ Tue Aug 25, 2009 3:38 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: World of Warcraft: Cataclysm |
Buy CS:S and TF2 congratulations on your infinite gameplay. |
Author: | Miles_T3hR4t [ Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:46 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: World of Warcraft: Cataclysm |
1) Orange box + Garry's mod, way more game-play for your money, until your mouse breaks like mine. 2) insert free MMO's that get more updates than WoW *cough**cough**maplestory**Cough 3) just like the blood elves and space-goats, the werewolves and goblins should be on opposite sides. In WC3 TFT, the Draeni side with the horde, as of WC3 goblins where neutral. the alliance hunts and kills werewolves, see: Shadowfang keep. note: alliance quest. and 4, Blizzard is well known for having furries in there games, dating way back to when they actually did console games. Diablo had goat men, snake men, cat-people that throw grenades, and the god damn druid. and the furries had much rejoicing. Warcraft has had : Satyrs, worgen, werewolves (that aren't worgen), bugbears, owlbears, Driads, snake people, fish people, harpies (bird people), and.... well thats just the tip of the iceberg for that one. So saying "oh noez they added furries to WoW" is redundant, furries where in Warcraft, Warcraft 2, Warcraft 3, even WoW in the FIRST VERSION THAT WAS OUT, They just wheren't exactly playable at the time. And you know what? most of what they add is either pre-planned, or requested so..... yeah people wanted to play as some sort of animal person. deal with it, and never speak of that again. |
Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |