I got this idea of using a heavy (enough to sink in Akbalala's water) ACRocket (doesn't gib when sitting still) attached with several negative-mass attachables that makes it light enough to float. As the negative mass attachables are damanged and destroyed, the rocket becomes unbalanes and lists to one side. If the listing is serious enough to cause it to capsize, it will explode as rockets that get flipped are gibbed after a while. Otherwise, if more more attachables are destroyed, the craft loses bouyancy and sinks below the surface, where it would be gibbed(could be done without using some fragile attachable, that would gib due to water's bouyance, as a triggger).

It could be armed with various missile and gun turret on the top and depth-bombs and torpedo tubes on the bottom.

oh noes, the water's bouyancy is acceleration and not force based, so this doesn't seem to work.

Force = Mass * Acceleration.
==> Acceleration = Force / Mass

Still should be possible.

Sounds perfectly possible to me. But the antimass thing is a little unnecessary, just use invisible emitters.

So to order it in it would just fall from the sky, then? Like the tradestar just happens to throw a rocket without thrusters (Fans, instead, right?) and hit water perfectly? Sounds cool.

Deliver it like the tank from the EDV ( http://forums.datarealms.com/viewtopic.php?f=61).
I like the idea quite a bit, I'd love to see this become something.

'Fraid that topic doesn't exist, according to the forum.

i was thinking of doing some concpet subs for water but then i found out that the game cannot do dynimic water.

Whoops, I fail at trimming links.
Dynamic water is irrelevant if you're far enough under the surface, nobody would notice.
The water that we've got is good enough for a ship to sail in nicely.

Yes but i like the idea of having small amounts of lakes and pools not just one sea, sure the game engion cannot surpport this because of small army of reasons, now that i have that in the open someone will say "if you don't like it don't download it"

Actually I would've said "If you don't like it make it better."
It's a bit more constructive.