Data Realms Fan Forums
http://45.55.195.193/

(now a zombie killing effectiveness thread)
http://45.55.195.193/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=16976
Page 1 of 29

Author:  TomThom [ Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:56 am ]
Post subject:  (now a zombie killing effectiveness thread)

http://www.hungrylizardstudio.com/art3d ... otgun.html

i was looking up hicks on google images, and this came up. pretty awesome gun.

Author:  Grif [ Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:29 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Real life gatling shotgun

that is not real life

that is called a 3d model

spoilers: those robots in transformers (and megan fox) are not real either

Author:  TomThom [ Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:08 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Real life gatling shotgun

ah, you're right. i only glanced at it really, i was more focused on the hicks thing. but on second look the gloss and edges give it away. still, would be nice to tote it about.

Author:  Metal Meltdown [ Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:25 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Real life gatling shotgun

Erm, assuming that WERE real, why would anyone make something so useless?

Author:  Foa [ Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:32 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Real life gatling shotgun

Metal Meltdown wrote:
Erm, assuming that WERE real, why would anyone make something so useless?

Useless, it can shred the ♥♥♥♥ out of infantry, and possible render many forms of locomotions unusable, scare the ♥♥♥♥ out of people, and probably be a better AA/Projectile Interceptor device than some of the current methods ( normal gatling ) .

Grif, Megan Fox is real, it's just her 'beauty' and 'talent' that aren't.

Author:  Exalion [ Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:38 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Real life gatling shotgun

Link Dump anyone?

Author:  Metal Meltdown [ Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:42 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Real life gatling shotgun

Foa wrote:
Metal Meltdown wrote:
Erm, assuming that WERE real, why would anyone make something so useless?

Useless, it can shred the ♥♥♥♥ out of infantry, and possible render many forms of locomotions unusable, scare the ♥♥♥♥ out of people, and probably be a better AA/Projectile Interceptor device than some of the current methods ( normal gatling ) .

Yeah, too bad it'd be useless at more than 20 meters, meaning it could be taken out with a grenade, and no, no way in ♥♥♥♥ hell it would ever work as an AA/Anti-Projectile weapon, exactly because of its retardedly short range.

Author:  Foa [ Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:49 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Real life gatling shotgun

Metal Meltdown wrote:
Foa wrote:
Metal Meltdown wrote:
Erm, assuming that WERE real, why would anyone make something so useless?

Useless, it can shred the ♥♥♥♥ out of infantry, and possible render many forms of locomotions unusable, scare the ♥♥♥♥ out of people, and probably be a better AA/Projectile Interceptor device than some of the current methods ( normal gatling ) .

Yeah, too bad it'd be useless at more than 20 meters, meaning it could be taken out with a grenade, and no, no way in ♥♥♥♥ hell it would ever work as an AA/Anti-Projectile weapon, exactly because of its retardedly short range.

Meh, develop long range ammo.
If we can launch a grenade >80meters with a shotgun, we should be able to launch fragments/flechette further.

Author:  Metal Meltdown [ Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:52 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Real life gatling shotgun

It's not the distance they can reach that's called into question, it's the fact that every pellet/flechette/w/e is kind of undamaging by itself against body armor, and they spread out over distance.

Author:  411570N3 [ Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:54 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Real life gatling shotgun

Shotguns aren't as ineffective at range as video games tell you.
But they're nowhere near effective at the range needed for anti-aircraft.
Foa wrote:
probably be a better AA/Projectile Interceptor device than some of the current methods ( normal gatling )
Ahahahahahahahahah...
Anyway.
GAU 8 Avenger.
It's an anti-tank gatling gun.
It fires 4 thousand rounds a minute.
Each round is 17 cm long.

So yeah, a gatling shotgun has no apparent advantage that I can see.

Author:  Foa [ Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:56 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Real life gatling shotgun

411570N3 wrote:
Shotguns aren't as ineffective at range as video games tell you.
But they're nowhere near effective at the range needed for anti-aircraft.
Foa wrote:
probably be a better AA/Projectile Interceptor device than some of the current methods ( normal gatling )
Ahahahahahahahahah...
Anyway.
GAU 8 Avenger.
It's an anti-tank gatling gun.
It fires 4 thousand rounds a minute.
Each round is 17 cm long.

So yeah, a gatling shotgun has no apparent advantage that I can see.

Aha, we have the technology to launch bullets with electric impulses, therefore we can ( and already have ) launch bullets faster than that puny gatling!
But I do admit defeat on the shotgun gatling, oh and buckshots are less expensive than anti-tank grade ammunition.

Author:  Metal Meltdown [ Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:58 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Real life gatling shotgun

GAU-8 is useless without the marvelous aircraft that holds it. Also, Foa, yes, electrical impulses *can* launch bullets faster, but it takes so long to reload those things that you're better off with the Gatling.

Author:  Foa [ Tue Oct 27, 2009 9:03 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Real life gatling shotgun

Metal Meltdown wrote:
GAU-8 is useless without the marvelous aircraft that holds it. Also, Foa, yes, electrical impulses *can* launch bullets faster, but it takes so long to reload those things that you're better off with the Gatling.

Just make the damn thing magazine/chain fed!

We can make portabls turrets that can hold GAU-8, and possibly arm a tank with, and only one of those things.

Author:  Metal Meltdown [ Tue Oct 27, 2009 9:05 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Real life gatling shotgun

The GAU-8 was longer than a tank, last time I checked, and anyways, why do that? The Warthog is awesome-looking, can fly with half of its fuselage shredded and a single engine, is harder to hit, and offers better attack angles than a tank/turret.

Author:  411570N3 [ Tue Oct 27, 2009 11:22 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Real life gatling shotgun

Foa wrote:
Metal Meltdown wrote:
electrical impulses *can* launch bullets faster, but it takes so long to reload those things that you're better off with the Gatling.

Just make the damn thing magazine/chain fed!
You are a genius. Nobody has thought of or attempted to make electrically fired weapons more efficient. Ever. [/Sarcasm]
Metal Meltdown wrote:
GAU-8 is useless without the marvelous aircraft that holds it.
Oh, of course. Because gatling shotguns are used as man-portable weapons; definitely not for mounts or vehicles or anything. [/Sarcasm]
Foa wrote:
buckshots are less expensive than anti-tank grade ammunition.
Not if you price by tank kills. I'm pretty sure it'd take a few more rounds of buckshot to destroy a tank than anti-tank rounds, especially from the air.
And yes, the GAU-8 has smaller cousins that could possibly be tank/turret-mounted.

Page 1 of 29 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/