View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu Jan 02, 2025 7:27 pm



This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 421 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 ... 29  Next
 (now a zombie killing effectiveness thread) 
Author Message
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 9:57 am
Posts: 4886
Location: some compy
Post Re: (now a zombie killing effectiveness thread)
TomThom wrote:
about the wikipedia thing, don't forget books. books have useful things inside them too. like paper, and words.
wow i totally didnt just say that a page ago <_<
the point is, even when all the power is down, if you grab the HDDs you can plug them into a computer and grab the info off them. wikipedia and any servers with interesting whitepapers on them would be high on my list, but i suppose you'd need a more general coverage of knowledge.

also, i bought this up at school with a game where you pick 5 people or weapons.
my pick is currently an M9, .22 rifle and Ithaca 37 20 guage plus one other person and a bat. the only flaw with it is the lack of interchangeable ammo..
one friend decided he wanted 2 machetes, a glock, an MP5 and another party member. im not sure which is really more viable, especially if the infected's blood is infectious... but im thinking i'd would be better off using a 9mm SMG rather than the .22. thoughts?


Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:46 am
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 1:54 am
Posts: 139
Post Re: (now a zombie killing effectiveness thread)
i never said you didn't, people just seem to be infatuated with digital, so i pointed it out again. it would be nice to take the Amazon server though, with all their digital books...

oh, i played that game before. i chose a military fortress on an island(weapons, food, shelter,mental and physical security). and 4 other people to help me start up a small society. the game didn't have many rules.


Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:09 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:24 am
Posts: 96
Post Re: (now a zombie killing effectiveness thread)
For a zombie apoc i would want something reliable like an AK-74 and a PM.
I'm Russian.


Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:54 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:24 pm
Posts: 20
Post Re: (now a zombie killing effectiveness thread)
Geti wrote:
but im thinking i'd would be better off using a 9mm SMG rather than the .22. thoughts?


The terminal ballistics 9x19 parabellum are obviously more devastating than a .22, which is good since the head isn't exactly a large target and if you hit anywhere else you at least want to slow them down. .22 also might not effectively and thoroughly damage their gray matter. It would also be more effective since the world would obviously be in martial law, every man for himself. .22 isn't exactly effective against anything larger than a rabbit unless you hit the heart, upper spine, or brain. All small targets ofcourse.

Dudemauler wrote:
For a zombie apoc i would want something reliable like an AK-74 and a PM.
I'm Russian.


The advantage with AK pattern rifles is obviously reliability even when running without lubrication, durability, and ease of maintenance. The common argument against them is they're inaccurate, which is a complete lie. A good AK-74 in 5.45 can peg a man size target out to around 400 meters, plenty enough. The AK or AKM in 7.62 soviet about 300 meters. Still plenty enough for most situations, especially in a zombie apocalypse when accuracy isn't really top priority.


Last edited by Loen on Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:44 am, edited 2 times in total.



Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:34 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 1:54 am
Posts: 139
Post Re: (now a zombie killing effectiveness thread)
Loen wrote:
Geti wrote:
TomThom wrote:
but im thinking i'd would be better off using a 9mm SMG rather than the .22. thoughts?


The terminal ballistics 9x19 parabellum are obviously more devastating than a .22, which is good since the head isn't exactly a large target and if you hit anywhere else you at least want to slow them down. .22 also might not effectively and thoroughly damage their gray matter. It would also be more effective since the world would obviously be in martial law, every man for himself. .22 isn't exactly effective against anything larger than a rabbit unless you hit the heart, upper spine, or brain. All small targets ofcourse.


why does this quote me saying it? geti said it.


Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:42 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:24 pm
Posts: 20
Post Re: (now a zombie killing effectiveness thread)
TomThom wrote:
Loen wrote:
Geti wrote:
TomThom wrote:
but im thinking i'd would be better off using a 9mm SMG rather than the .22. thoughts?


The terminal ballistics 9x19 parabellum are obviously more devastating than a .22, which is good since the head isn't exactly a large target and if you hit anywhere else you at least want to slow them down. .22 also might not effectively and thoroughly damage their gray matter. It would also be more effective since the world would obviously be in martial law, every man for himself. .22 isn't exactly effective against anything larger than a rabbit unless you hit the heart, upper spine, or brain. All small targets ofcourse.


why does this quote me saying it? geti said it.


lolwhat

Fixed, didn't notice that.


Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:44 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 9:57 am
Posts: 4886
Location: some compy
Post Re: (now a zombie killing effectiveness thread)
quote pyramids make my head hurt. there should be a rule against them.
in any case, mmn, i think i'd prefer being able to interchange rounds as well, so i might change my "choice" to a 9mm smg, though i suppose the availability for a civ would be.. dubious.


Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:23 am
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:24 pm
Posts: 20
Post Re: (now a zombie killing effectiveness thread)
Geti wrote:
quote pyramids make my head hurt. there should be a rule against them.
in any case, mmn, i think i'd prefer being able to interchange rounds as well, so i might change my "choice" to a 9mm smg, though i suppose the availability for a civ would be.. dubious.


There's always 9mm carbines such as the Hi-point 995 carbine, Kel-tec SUB-2000, Beretta CX4 storm, etc.


Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:15 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 9:57 am
Posts: 4886
Location: some compy
Post Re: (now a zombie killing effectiveness thread)
True. I aren't very sure of their availability in new zealand though (like, i seriously doubt i'd be able to find one at all), but it would definitely be better to get my hands on a carbine than an SMG :P


Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:55 am
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:09 am
Posts: 1115
Location: Being The Great Juju
Post Re: (now a zombie killing effectiveness thread)
Random weapon poll (random meaning I made a list of every weapon ever made and threw darts at it to get my choices)- which would you prefer, assuming you could get any one weapon from each class? Explain why.

Melee - A blunt or sharp weapon?
Handgun - A Colt M1911 or a Glock 21?
SMG - An H&K UMP or an FN P90? (ridiculous choices, perhaps, but how fun would it be to unload a 50 round magazine into a tight crowd of zombies in 3 seconds?)
Carbine - A Colt M4 or a SIG SG 500?
(light) Machine Gun - An M249 or an H&K MG4?
Rifle - A Lee Enfield or an M14?
Sniper Rifle - An M40 or an AI AWM?


Fri Nov 06, 2009 1:56 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 1:54 am
Posts: 139
Post Re: (now a zombie killing effectiveness thread)
Melee - lightsaber for fantasy, in real life i would prefer a supply of polearms, for distance, sharp edge, stabbing point, and if i need an axe i'll just snap the pole(for close quarters).
Handgun - A Colt M1911. proven reliability.
SMG - i don't know much about this type of gun, but i would say the MP5.
Carbine - H&K 416.
(light) Machine Gun - A .50 caliber M2 machine gun
Rifle - .22 rimfire rifle for ammo carrying capacity.
Sniper Rifle - Grendel Rifle


Fri Nov 06, 2009 2:18 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:24 pm
Posts: 20
Post Re: (now a zombie killing effectiveness thread)
TomThom wrote:
(light) Machine Gun - A .50 caliber M2 machine gun


That's a heavy machine gun, surely not man-portable either.

Melee - Entrenching tool
Handgun - Sig P226
Subgun - Heckler und Koch MP-10
Assault rifle - Sig 551
Battle rifle - Kel-tec RFB
LMG - M249


Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:10 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 1:54 am
Posts: 139
Post Re: (now a zombie killing effectiveness thread)
woops. oh well, i'm more of a camper anyway, and i would like a pickup truck to use them from, going on foot just sounds silly. especially because zombies don't sleep.


Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:18 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 9:26 am
Posts: 1633
Post Re: (now a zombie killing effectiveness thread)
Melee - Katana
Handgun - Glock .45
Subgun - umm....Micro-Uzi?
Assault rifle - AK-74
Battle rifle - No clue
LMG - Would I need one?


Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:37 am
Profile
REAL AMERICAN HERO
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 10:25 pm
Posts: 5655
Post Re: (now a zombie killing effectiveness thread)
melee: none, but a kabar/multitool for general use (knives rock)
smg: anything available, ideally in a common caliber. ideal: mp5/ump
handgun: anything available in a common caliber, ideal: m1911 (sexy) or m9, both common and reliable
lmg: none, none needed
ar: ar-15 or ak variant
"sniper" rifle/general rifle: m14 DMR/EMR for tacticool, anything really


Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:44 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.   [ 421 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 ... 29  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.
[ Time : 0.046s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]