Author |
Message |
The Fat Sand Rat
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 5:56 am Posts: 1191 Location: outside the shithole called the University in the Forest
|
Re: StarWars
I learned from all of your mistakes and voted 2/1.
|
Wed Oct 01, 2008 3:11 am |
|
|
venn177
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 5:35 am Posts: 3778 Location: Largo, Florida
|
Re: StarWars
I think what he wants us to do is vote for all of the ones we like EXCEPT our favorite... which is illogical.
|
Wed Oct 01, 2008 3:14 am |
|
|
grenade
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 5:29 pm Posts: 607 Location: Ukraine,Odessa in the ASC bunker-base
|
Re: StarWars
Kind of unusual vote type , yeah ? (for you). We have sucher votes in our country.Hey now hatest is IV and fav is III.My tricknees is HUGE,but that wasnt special.Im sorry if i hurted you.
|
Wed Oct 01, 2008 1:26 pm |
|
|
AtomicTroop
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 1:28 pm Posts: 328 Location: Finland
|
Re: StarWars
What the hell? You can't be serious, IV is the best, while III, II, I are the worst! You are cheating people into voting for the wrong ones with that explanation.
|
Wed Oct 01, 2008 3:15 pm |
|
|
venn177
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 5:35 am Posts: 3778 Location: Largo, Florida
|
Re: StarWars
AtomicTroop wrote: What the hell? You can't be serious, IV is the best, while III, II, I are the worst! You are cheating people into voting for the wrong ones with that explanation. 3 > 6 ♥♥♥♥ budget cut ewoks!
|
Wed Oct 01, 2008 7:37 pm |
|
|
alaifain
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 7:44 pm Posts: 230 Location: Vancouver, BC
|
Re: StarWars
|
Wed Oct 01, 2008 8:15 pm |
|
|
ProjektODIN
Banned
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 6:09 pm Posts: 432
|
Re: StarWars
Post above reported.
This thread is full of fail. I thought we said no more THIS OR THAT poll threads?
|
Thu Oct 02, 2008 4:15 am |
|
|
Fearful_Ferret
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 3:36 pm Posts: 676
|
Re: StarWars
Fail thread, but I'll respond in the hopes that idiocity shall never go unrewarded.
I liked the first 3 (as in the last 3 in the SW time scale) more than the rest, but I didn't mind the others, though they got better as they went on. Phantom Menace was pretty stupid, but Clone Wars and the 3rd one (can't even remember the name, which I suppose says a lot by itself) made up for mediocrity with pretty visuals. Honestly, the books are better, but even then, you should get the books published first. The Clone Wars novels just aren't that great, and the Yuuzhan Vong storyline was completely useless, save for killing Chewbacca (not a good thing, though I admire the style). Anything not involving Solo offspring or Jango clones is probably a good book. Especially stuff by Michael A. Stackpole or Timothy Zahn. Especially the X-Wing series. Especially I, Jedi.
|
Thu Oct 02, 2008 4:40 am |
|
|
Seraph
Moderator Hero
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 11:28 pm Posts: 868 Location: London Server
|
Re: StarWars
I love the books written before the Yuzzahn Vong storyline, as they actually still have something to do with the original characters. Now it so and so's son battling so and so's daughter, who eventually discovers someone elses long lost ♥♥♥♥ COUSIN whilst all the original characters watch from their wheelchairs and zimmer frames.
Yeah, the original three movies were good for the time that they were released, Phantom was good minus Jar Jar, Clone Wars was just plain terrible but I believe that III redeemed the new CGI trilogy by having a slightly better script and an epic lightsaber fight. Don't even think of bringing the clone wars CGI film thing into this either.
|
Thu Oct 02, 2008 1:35 pm |
|
|
Electroclan
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 4:39 am Posts: 521
|
Re: StarWars
Thought a certain someone was currently taking care of this but they didn't.
Anyway topic locked, useless poll and topic is full of crap and BBQ.
|
Thu Oct 02, 2008 6:36 pm |
|
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|