View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu Jan 16, 2025 10:36 pm



Reply to topic  [ 559 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 ... 38  Next
 CONTENT TWEAK THREAD 
Author Message

Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 2:11 am
Posts: 5
Reply with quote
Post Re: So, official orders from devs
1:increase browncoat awsomeness
2:make it impossible to load more than 10 units/items on a craft, I onc emanaged to put in so many crabs into a crate that it caused an earthquake that destroyed EVERYTHING on the map.


Tue Aug 25, 2009 6:38 am
Profile
Loose Canon
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 2992
Location: --------------->
Reply with quote
Post Re: So, official orders from devs
Increase the MOID count so that heads exploding randomly won't be a problem.


Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:17 am
Profile WWW
DRL Developer
DRL Developer

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 10:29 am
Posts: 4107
Location: Russia
Reply with quote
Post Re: So, official orders from devs
Megakiller wrote:
1:increase browncoat awsomeness
They will be more beefed up in the next build.
2:make it impossible to load more than 10 units/items on a craft, I onc emanaged to put in so many crabs into a crate that it caused an earthquake that destroyed EVERYTHING on the map.
No. Just no. Because it's fun to put a bunch of crabs together and watch them fight to their deaths.

Also, some more BALLISTIC dummy weapons could not hurt, because right now only weapons i see fitting to the dummies are the nailers (and the revolver cannon too).


Tue Aug 25, 2009 12:39 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:40 am
Posts: 1527
Location: In heaven, everything is fine.
Reply with quote
Post Re: So, official orders from devs
Lizard wrote:
Also, some more BALLISTIC dummy weapons could not hurt, because right now only weapons i see fitting to the dummies are the nailers (and the revolver cannon too).


Experimental energy weapons fit the Dummies too. It's just that there's too many of them.


Tue Aug 25, 2009 3:52 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 3:19 pm
Posts: 2073
Reply with quote
Post Re: So, official orders from devs
Hyperkultra wrote:
Increase the MOID count so that heads exploding randomly won't be a problem.

I actually think the first and probably most important thing that needs to be done is optimization of CC's engine (Even at the current state) and allowing GPU usage. It would boost FPS and will most likely allow higher MOID counts without crazy lag.


Tue Aug 25, 2009 4:43 pm
Profile

Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 6:49 pm
Posts: 69
Reply with quote
Post Re: So, official orders from devs
LowestFormOfWit wrote:
To be honest I'm this close to making my own tutorial.


Do it LFOW you will be greatly praised.


Last edited by Eviltebor on Wed Aug 26, 2009 9:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:39 pm
Profile
DRL Developer
DRL Developer

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 10:29 am
Posts: 4107
Location: Russia
Reply with quote
Post Re: So, official orders from devs
How the hell could LFOW optimize the engine of CC?


Tue Aug 25, 2009 9:23 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 2:04 am
Posts: 1559
Reply with quote
Post Re: So, official orders from devs
I think he meant what I last said, which was to make my own tutorial.
Needed a quote button.


Tue Aug 25, 2009 10:04 pm
Profile

Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:38 pm
Posts: 1
Reply with quote
Post Re: So, official orders from devs
1: ..Make an actual campaign with some kind of point, rather than a few missions that have little to do with anything.

2: Fix the movement AI - my soldiers very rarely will actually engage the enemy if behind cover, as they are too busy compacting themselves into a tiny fetal ball against said cover. Its awful.

3: The dismemberment system is awesome, however there should be considerably more wounding options. Add internal organs and a skeletal structure to the actors, with corresponding lung/brain/etc use.


In my own opinion, if any of these three things (if any ONE of these three things) were added, I and a few others would gladly buy the game. As it stands, its just a way to kill a little bit of time and encourage modders to really go wild with creative thinking (not a bad thing).


Tue Aug 25, 2009 11:04 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 10:50 pm
Posts: 2175
Location: Neverwhere
Reply with quote
Post Re: So, official orders from devs
Frankly, I think that all ballistic dummy weapons should be change to energy. More diversity that way.


Wed Aug 26, 2009 12:12 am
Profile
DRL Developer
DRL Developer
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 5:27 am
Posts: 3138
Location: A little south and a lot west of Moscow
Reply with quote
Post Re: So, official orders from devs
Kruniac:
1. That's currently in progress.
2. (I really am hoping and probably am right that) that's currently in progress.
3. That would be pretty hard to pull off given the way the system is currently done, and, with actors that are admittedly pretty tiny on the screen, probably wouldn't be worth the extra effort and processing power.


Wed Aug 26, 2009 12:18 am
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 12:50 pm
Posts: 899
Reply with quote
Post Re: So, official orders from devs
TheLastBanana wrote:
3. That would be pretty hard to pull off given the way the system is currently done, and, with actors that are admittedly pretty tiny on the screen, probably wouldn't be worth the extra effort and processing power.

Arne did mention he wanted to have fractured limbs and whatnot.


Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:25 am
Profile WWW

Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 6:48 pm
Posts: 3
Reply with quote
Post Re: So, official orders from devs
I read large part of this thread and i acclaim with this ideas:

1. More durable materials specialy doors and bunker parts, but dirt and rocks also.

2. Less fuel in jetpacks, more climbing abilities.

3. Less powerfull and accurate weapons or more durable actors (to make firefights last a bit longer)

My 2 cents:
The mining requires too much micromanagement. I suggest to replace gold with diamonds or somethng similar. The diamond ore or diamond crystals would be much much harder to mine ,far more valuable and diamond fields would be scarce. You could bring a actor to diamond ore and let the AI mine for a long time creating a steady income. This would make such mining sites a valuable thing to hold and deffend and thus adding a strategic aspect to every battle.
(Note the material could stay gold but as i said it should create a steady income and not a quick money bonus.)


Fri Aug 28, 2009 10:17 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 9:57 am
Posts: 4886
Location: some compy
Reply with quote
Post Re: So, official orders from devs
wow, you didnt read the OP did you?
here, i'll drag up the important part:
Grif wrote:
What content do you want tweaked/removed/fixed, AND WHY.
i dont see "suggest new ♥♥♥♥" anywhere in there.


Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:42 am
Profile WWW

Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 6:48 pm
Posts: 3
Reply with quote
Post Re: So, official orders from devs
Geti wrote:
wow, you didnt read the OP did you?
here, i'll drag up the important part:
Grif wrote:
What content do you want tweaked/removed/fixed, AND WHY.
i dont see "suggest new crap" anywhere in there.


Ok,
1.Tweak materials cause its too easy to break into bunkers.
2.Tweak jetpacks cause its easy and looks silly to hover over battlefield.
3.Im taking back what i said about guns, i had low resolutions and so i couldn't see far, that's why the firefights were so quick. ...my bad.

Tweak gold to be harder to mine and less common and to give you smaller amount of money but over longer periods of time.
:razz:


Sat Aug 29, 2009 10:55 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 559 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 ... 38  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.
[ Time : 0.087s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]